Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes that data symmetries generally do not create conserved quantities in neural networks unless the loss function is mean squared error, a finding that clarifies theoretical expectations for gradient-flow training. The authors introduce a framework using tensorizable networks to model these specific scenarios, covering architectures like linear, polynomial networks, and Lightning Attention. For practitioners, this highlights the critical role of loss function selection and architectural separability in determining whether data augmentation leads to unexpected conservation laws.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Conservation Laws from Data Symmetry in Neural Networks

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.10913v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We explore whether intrinsic symmetries of the training data lead to conserved quantities during gradient-flow training of neural networks. Under the assumption that the loss function is analytic and non-polynomial, we prove that data symmetries generically do not induce any additional integrals of motion. For mean squared error (MSE) loss, on the other hand, there are situations in which data augmentation yields extra conserved quantities. We build a framework, utilizing \emph{tensorizable networks} to describe this phenomenon. Tensorizable networks are a family of architectures whose dependence on parameters and inputs can be separated using an intermediate representation. They include linear and polynomial networks, as well as Lightning Attention.

Abstract:We explore whether intrinsic symmetries of the training data lead to conserved quantities during gradient-flow training of neural networks. Under the assumption that the loss function is analytic and non-polynomial, we prove that data symmetries generically do not induce any additional integrals of motion. For mean squared error (MSE) loss, on the other hand, there are situations in which data augmentation yields extra conserved quantities. We build a framework, utilizing \emph{tensorizable networks} to describe this phenomenon. Tensorizable networks are a family of architectures whose dependence on parameters and inputs can be separated using an intermediate representation. They include linear and polynomial networks, as well as Lightning Attention.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2606.10913 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.10913v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10913 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 204 words

Related coverage