Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a partial verification method for conformal prediction that achieves identical prediction sets while significantly reducing the computational cost of label verification. By coordinating verification across calibration examples, the approach cuts expenses by 15-82% compared to standard sequential checking without compromising finite-sample guarantees. The work addresses a key efficiency bottleneck in deploying reliable uncertainty quantification methods within practical machine learning pipelines.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Conformal Prediction under Partial Verification

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.10829v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conformal prediction provides prediction sets with finite-sample guarantees, but the label verification required for calibration can be expensive. We develop a partial verification method that returns exactly the same prediction sets as complete verification. We characterize calibration certificates, the verified information sufficient to determine the conformal threshold, and design a procedure that coordinates verification across calibration examples. For finite thresholds at high coverage, its verification cost is less than twice the minimum certificate cost when candidates are checked in order. Across retrieval, mathematical solutions, and configuration evaluation, it reduces verification cost by 15-82% compared with verifying calibration examples one at a time, while producing identical prediction sets.

Abstract:Conformal prediction provides prediction sets with finite-sample guarantees, but the label verification required for calibration can be expensive. We develop a partial verification method that returns exactly the same prediction sets as complete verification. We characterize calibration certificates, the verified information sufficient to determine the conformal threshold, and design a procedure that coordinates verification across calibration examples. For finite thresholds at high coverage, its verification cost is less than twice the minimum certificate cost when candidates are checked in order. Across retrieval, mathematical solutions, and configuration evaluation, it reduces verification cost by 15-82% compared with verifying calibration examples one at a time, while producing identical prediction sets.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.10829 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2610.10829v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10829 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 204 words

Related coverage