aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces a distribution-free framework using conformal outlier detection to validate external data quality before acquisition in personalized machine learning tasks. By employing novel two-sample testing procedures, it provides rigorous statistical guarantees for identifying valuable data agents while controlling false discovery rates under arbitrary contamination levels. The method addresses critical challenges in data trading scenarios where sample diversity could otherwise degrade model performance in sensitive applications like medical diagnosis.
Conformal Data Contamination Tests for In-distribution Data Acquisition
arXiv:2507.13835v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The amount of quality data in many machine learning tasks is limited to what is available locally to data owners. The set of quality data can be expanded through trading or sharing with external data agents. However, external data may be contaminated or introduce undesirable sample diversity which can degrade performance of personalized machine learning tasks, as in diagnosis of a rare disease or recommendation systems. Therefore, data buyers need quality guarantees prior to data acquisition. Previous works primarily rely on distributional assumptions about data from different agents, relegating quality checks to post-hoc steps involving costly data valuation procedures. We propose a distribution-free, contamination-aware data acquisition framework that, by inspecting only a small volume of data, identifies external data agents whose data is most valuable for model personalization. To achieve this, we introduce novel two-sample testing procedures, preceding full data acquisition, grounded in rigorous theoretical foundations for conformal outlier detection, to determine whether an agent's data exceeds a contamination threshold. The proposed tests, termed conformal data contamination tests, remain valid under arbitrary contamination levels and the novel Storey-type test provably enables finite-sample false discovery rate control via the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Empirical evaluations across diverse collaborative learning scenarios demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of our approach. Overall, the conformal data contamination test distinguishes itself as a generic procedure for aggregating data with statistically rigorous quality guarantees.
Abstract:The amount of quality data in many machine learning tasks is limited to what is available locally to data owners. The set of quality data can be expanded through trading or sharing with external data agents. However, external data may be contaminated or introduce undesirable sample diversity which can degrade performance of personalized machine learning tasks, as in diagnosis of a rare disease or recommendation systems. Therefore, data buyers need quality guarantees prior to data acquisition. Previous works primarily rely on distributional assumptions about data from different agents, relegating quality checks to post-hoc steps involving costly data valuation procedures. We propose a distribution-free, contamination-aware data acquisition framework that, by inspecting only a small volume of data, identifies external data agents whose data is most valuable for model personalization. To achieve this, we introduce novel two-sample testing procedures, preceding full data acquisition, grounded in rigorous theoretical foundations for conformal outlier detection, to determine whether an agent's data exceeds a contamination threshold. The proposed tests, termed conformal data contamination tests, remain valid under arbitrary contamination levels and the novel Storey-type test provably enables finite-sample false discovery rate control via the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Empirical evaluations across diverse collaborative learning scenarios demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of our approach. Overall, the conformal data contamination test distinguishes itself as a generic procedure for aggregating data with statistically rigorous quality guarantees.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2507.13835 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2507.13835v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.13835 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 320 words
Related coverage
Testing For Distribution Shifts with Conditional Conformal Test Martingales
arXiv · Jun 15, 2026
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · Oct 8, 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · May 29, 2026

Top 10 Best API Security Tools in 2026 [Ranked & Scored]
Cybersecurity News · Oct 8, 2026