aiqbench analysis
ConceptTree advances interpretable AI by reframing robotic skill selection as reasoning over human-interpretable concepts within a decision tree structure. This approach replaces opaque latent representations with traceable logic that allows for direct inspection and modification of policy behavior without retraining the entire model. The framework demonstrates superior performance in complex, long-horizon manipulation tasks while enabling fine-grained intervention to correct specific decision errors.
ConceptTree: Bringing Semantic Transparency to Black-Box Decision Making for Robotic Manipulation
arXiv:2607.17861v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Establishing interpretable decision-making processes in long-horizon robotic manipulation is critical for enabling reliable human oversight and intervention. However, existing approaches to robotic manipulation largely treat skill selection as opaque mappings from observations to actions, offering limited transparency into how decisions are formed. In this work, we propose ConceptTree, a framework that reframes high-level manipulation skill selection as reasoning over human-interpretable concepts, representing high-level policies as a sequence of concept-level predicates over visual observations. Rather than relying on implicit latent representations, our method learns a normalized concept space grounded in visual inputs, over which a decision tree is trained to predict high-level skills. This formulation yields a transparent decision process that is both traceable and intervenable, enabling direct inspection and modification of policy behavior. We evaluate our approach on a set of real-world robotic manipulation tasks with increasing complexity. Experimental results show that ConceptTree consistently outperforms existing concept-based baselines, particularly in complex, long-horizon scenarios. Furthermore, we provide qualitative case studies showing that our model supports fine-grained intervention by modifying individual concepts, enabling targeted correction of decision errors without retraining.
Abstract:Establishing interpretable decision-making processes in long-horizon robotic manipulation is critical for enabling reliable human oversight and intervention. However, existing approaches to robotic manipulation largely treat skill selection as opaque mappings from observations to actions, offering limited transparency into how decisions are formed. In this work, we propose ConceptTree, a framework that reframes high-level manipulation skill selection as reasoning over human-interpretable concepts, representing high-level policies as a sequence of concept-level predicates over visual observations. Rather than relying on implicit latent representations, our method learns a normalized concept space grounded in visual inputs, over which a decision tree is trained to predict high-level skills. This formulation yields a transparent decision process that is both traceable and intervenable, enabling direct inspection and modification of policy behavior. We evaluate our approach on a set of real-world robotic manipulation tasks with increasing complexity. Experimental results show that ConceptTree consistently outperforms existing concept-based baselines, particularly in complex, long-horizon scenarios. Furthermore, we provide qualitative case studies showing that our model supports fine-grained intervention by modifying individual concepts, enabling targeted correction of decision errors without retraining.
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.17861 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2607.17861v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17861 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

Podcast: The Future of AI: from Enterprise Adoption to Open Source Sovereignty
InfoQ · Sep 25, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026