aiqbench analysis
This paper theoretically resolves the compute-allocation trade-off between pretraining and fine-tuning by characterizing optimal splits through spectral decomposition of empirical covariances. It demonstrates that efficient resource distribution depends on how pretraining directions interact with downstream data geometry, offering a rigorous framework for optimizing training budgets in large-scale model development.
Compute-Optimal Pretrain--Fine-tune in Ridge Gradient Descent
arXiv:2609.16262v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pretraining followed by fine-tuning introduces a compute-allocation problem: under a fixed training budget, compute spent improving the upstream objective reduces the compute available for downstream adaptation. Despite its practical importance, this trade-off is not yet well understood theoretically, even in simple models. In this paper, we cast this allocation as a compute-split problem under a two-stage pretrain--fine-tune procedure with fixed total optimisation budget, using regularised least squares trained by gradient descent as a tractable setting. We characterise the optimal split under data-dependent evaluation geometries induced by the fine-tuning problem. Our results show that the allocation depends on how pretraining directions affect fine-tuning predictions and how fine-tuning shifts are seen through downstream data geometry. In particular, the relevant quantities are determined by prediction-relevant spectral components of the pretraining and fine-tuning empirical covariances. Technically, the analysis relies on a basis-invariant, eigenspace-level spectral decomposition, together with perturbative control of the non-commuting pretraining and fine-tuning dynamics.
Abstract:Pretraining followed by fine-tuning introduces a compute-allocation problem: under a fixed training budget, compute spent improving the upstream objective reduces the compute available for downstream adaptation. Despite its practical importance, this trade-off is not yet well understood theoretically, even in simple models. In this paper, we cast this allocation as a compute-split problem under a two-stage pretrain--fine-tune procedure with fixed total optimisation budget, using regularised least squares trained by gradient descent as a tractable setting. We characterise the optimal split under data-dependent evaluation geometries induced by the fine-tuning problem. Our results show that the allocation depends on how pretraining directions affect fine-tuning predictions and how fine-tuning shifts are seen through downstream data geometry. In particular, the relevant quantities are determined by prediction-relevant spectral components of the pretraining and fine-tuning empirical covariances. Technically, the analysis relies on a basis-invariant, eigenspace-level spectral decomposition, together with perturbative control of the non-commuting pretraining and fine-tuning dynamics.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.16262 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.16262v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16262 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 249 words
Related coverage
TACO: Ternary Absolute-max Column-wise One-sparse Optimizer for LLM Fine-Tuning
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
LiFT: Local Search via Linear Programming for Overfitting-Controlled Transformers
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026
Technical Dive into AMD’s MLPerf Training v6.0 Submission
AMD · Jun 16, 2026