Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This survey addresses the significant gap in AI capabilities regarding non-literal visual humor, analyzing how Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle to interpret cultural context and communicative intent beyond literal scene description. By organizing existing literature into a capability-centric hierarchy, it highlights critical barriers such as shortcut-prone evaluation metrics and weak evidence grounding that currently limit progress in both recognition and generation tasks. The work serves as an essential reference for researchers aiming to advance MLLM reasoning through better alignment with shared human knowledge rather than just visual data fusion.
Sources coveringarXiv, Interconnects, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Computational Humor with Multimodal LLMs: Methods, Datasets, Evaluation, and Challenges

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.19011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal humor in memes, cartoons, and comics remains difficult for AI systems because intended meaning depends on non-literal mechanisms, shared cultural knowledge, and communicative intent rather than literal scene description. This survey focuses on visual humor understanding in single-image and multi-panel artifacts, while treating humor generation as an emerging downstream frontier. We position the literature against prior humor, sarcasm, and general MLLM surveys and organize it using a capability-centric hierarchy spanning recognition, interpretation and reasoning, and generation. Under this lens, we synthesize benchmark design, evaluation protocols, and modeling paradigms, tracing the field's shift from task-specific fusion models to large-model approaches based on multimodal alignment, evidence-grounded reasoning, and controlled generation. We conclude by highlighting the main barriers to progress: shortcut-prone evaluation, limited cultural and narrative coverage, weak evidence grounding, and unresolved safety and ownership concerns.

Abstract:Multimodal humor in memes, cartoons, and comics remains difficult for AI systems because intended meaning depends on non-literal mechanisms, shared cultural knowledge, and communicative intent rather than literal scene description. This survey focuses on visual humor understanding in single-image and multi-panel artifacts, while treating humor generation as an emerging downstream frontier. We position the literature against prior humor, sarcasm, and general MLLM surveys and organize it using a capability-centric hierarchy spanning recognition, interpretation and reasoning, and generation. Under this lens, we synthesize benchmark design, evaluation protocols, and modeling paradigms, tracing the field's shift from task-specific fusion models to large-model approaches based on multimodal alignment, evidence-grounded reasoning, and controlled generation. We conclude by highlighting the main barriers to progress: shortcut-prone evaluation, limited cultural and narrative coverage, weak evidence grounding, and unresolved safety and ownership concerns.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multimedia (cs.MM)

arXiv:2607.19011 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.19011v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.19011 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words

Related coverage