Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This dissertation offers a critical examination of the societal and institutional impacts of Large Language Models, focusing on equity issues in AI detection tools and measurable shifts across global writing domains. It provides essential data on how LLM adoption is altering academic peer review, corporate communications, and scientific publishing while highlighting barriers for under-resourced researchers. The work underscores that understanding the future of information ecosystems requires analyzing both algorithmic capabilities and their unintended consequences on governance and accessibility.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, Effective Altruism Forum, TechCrunch
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Computational Approaches to Understanding Large Language Model Impact on Writing and Information Ecosystems

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2506.17467v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential to change how we write, communicate, and create, leading to rapid adoption across society. This dissertation examines how individuals and institutions are adapting to and engaging with this emerging technology through three research directions. First, I demonstrate how the institutional adoption of AI detectors introduces systematic biases, particularly disadvantaging writers of non-dominant language varieties, highlighting critical equity concerns in AI governance. Second, I present novel population-level algorithmic approaches that measure the increasing adoption of LLMs across writing domains, revealing consistent patterns of AI-assisted content in academic peer reviews, scientific publications, consumer complaints, corporate communications, job postings, and international organization press releases. Finally, I investigate LLMs' capability to provide feedback on research manuscripts through a large-scale empirical analysis, offering insights into their potential to support researchers who face barriers in accessing timely manuscript feedback, particularly early-career researchers and those from under-resourced settings.

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential to change how we write, communicate, and create, leading to rapid adoption across society. This dissertation examines how individuals and institutions are adapting to and engaging with this emerging technology through three research directions. First, I demonstrate how the institutional adoption of AI detectors introduces systematic biases, particularly disadvantaging writers of non-dominant language varieties, highlighting critical equity concerns in AI governance. Second, I present novel population-level algorithmic approaches that measure the increasing adoption of LLMs across writing domains, revealing consistent patterns of AI-assisted content in academic peer reviews, scientific publications, consumer complaints, corporate communications, job postings, and international organization press releases. Finally, I investigate LLMs' capability to provide feedback on research manuscripts through a large-scale empirical analysis, offering insights into their potential to support researchers who face barriers in accessing timely manuscript feedback, particularly early-career researchers and those from under-resourced settings.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2506.17467 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2506.17467v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 174 words

Related coverage