aiqbench analysis
This research advances learning-augmented algorithms for metrical task systems by compressing state predictions into a sparse set of landmarks reconstructed via Lipschitz extension. The study establishes theoretical bounds on additive excess cost and demonstrates how prediction interfaces—specifically absolute versus relative values—fundamentally impact algorithmic performance guarantees. These findings are significant for optimizing online learning scenarios where full-state prediction is computationally prohibitive or data-scarce.
Compressing Value Predictions for Learning-Augmented Metrical Task Systems
arXiv:2609.33580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-augmented algorithms for metrical task systems (MTS) can exploit predictions of canonical dual values, but existing formulations typically require a prediction for every state. We study whether these predictions can be compressed to a small set of representative states while retaining their algorithmic value. We introduce landmark-compressed value predictions, in which the predictor reports predicted dual values only at $m$ landmarks and the remaining values are reconstructed by a Lipschitz extension. Our algorithm achieves additive excess cost $O(T\,r(L) + \sum_t \delta_t)$, where $r(L)$ is the covering radius of the landmarks and $\delta_t$ measures prediction error up to additive shifts; local and value-dependent bounds refine this guarantee. For sparse landmark sets on unit-spaced finite lines, we prove a matching $\Omega(T r_m)$ lower bound for every randomized algorithm using fixed landmarks, even with advance access to their entire exact absolute-value table. The prediction interface also matters: on two states with one landmark, exact absolute values permit horizon-independent excess, whereas exact relative values force worst-case expected excess linear in $T$. We give PAC guarantees for learning compressed prediction tables, with efficient empirical-risk minimization for fixed landmarks. Our results connect metric coverage, prediction interfaces, and learning guarantees for compressed predictions in online MTS.
Abstract:Learning-augmented algorithms for metrical task systems (MTS) can exploit predictions of canonical dual values, but existing formulations typically require a prediction for every state. We study whether these predictions can be compressed to a small set of representative states while retaining their algorithmic value. We introduce landmark-compressed value predictions, in which the predictor reports predicted dual values only at $m$ landmarks and the remaining values are reconstructed by a Lipschitz extension. Our algorithm achieves additive excess cost $O(T\,r(L) + \sum_t \delta_t)$, where $r(L)$ is the covering radius of the landmarks and $\delta_t$ measures prediction error up to additive shifts; local and value-dependent bounds refine this guarantee. For sparse landmark sets on unit-spaced finite lines, we prove a matching $\Omega(T r_m)$ lower bound for every randomized algorithm using fixed landmarks, even with advance access to their entire exact absolute-value table. The prediction interface also matters: on two states with one landmark, exact absolute values permit horizon-independent excess, whereas exact relative values force worst-case expected excess linear in $T$. We give PAC guarantees for learning compressed prediction tables, with efficient empirical-risk minimization for fixed landmarks. Our results connect metric coverage, prediction interfaces, and learning guarantees for compressed predictions in online MTS.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
arXiv:2609.33580 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.33580v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33580 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words
Related coverage

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026
The hard physics and complex economics of AI’s insatiable hunger for power
SiliconANGLE · Sep 11, 2026

Presentation: Platform Teams Enabling AI - MCP/Multi-Agentic Tools across Linkedin
InfoQ · Jun 5, 2026

AI in healthcare: applications and best practices
Databricks · Jul 24, 2026