aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that XOR folding can significantly compress the recurrent interface in Tsetlin Machines without sacrificing meaningful accuracy compared to full clause feedback. The research highlights a critical trade-off where reduced memory width drastically lowers host execution time, challenging the assumption that wider interfaces are necessary for sequence modeling in resource-constrained environments. These findings offer practical guidance for deploying Boolean finite-state machines on small devices while emphasizing the need for rigorous no-feedback controls in benchmarking.
Compressed Recurrent Feedback in Tsetlin Machines: A Reproducible Boolean-FSM Study
arXiv:2609.06133v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential inference on small devices requires a model to retain useful history without repeatedly processing a long input record. A Recurrent Tsetlin Machine (RTM) provides this memory by returning Boolean clause outputs from one time step as inputs to the next. Direct feedback, however, grows with the clause bank and can make the recurrent input unnecessarily wide. This paper investigates a fixed-width alternative. We combine clause activations by exclusive-OR (XOR) folding, retain the folded bits at two time scales, and threshold them back to a binary state. The resulting design reduces 480 clause activations to 96 recurrent bits. We evaluate the method on a reproducible Boolean finite-state-machine benchmark with explicit transition rules, data splits, and random seeds. Across 144 runs, the compressed model obtains $61.47 \pm 6.74\%$ and $62.94 \pm 9.92\%$ accuracy on the two task families. Raw clause feedback changes these means by less than one percentage point, while increasing the recurrent width tenfold and measured host execution time by $4.38\times$ and $3.71\times$. Gated neural models remain more accurate, and a no-feedback control retaining only short input history achieves comparable or slightly higher accuracy. On this benchmark, folding matches raw feedback within small empirical margins at a much narrower interface; these findings also underscore the critical necessity of no-feedback recurrence controls when benchmarking sequence models.
Abstract:Sequential inference on small devices requires a model to retain useful history without repeatedly processing a long input record. A Recurrent Tsetlin Machine (RTM) provides this memory by returning Boolean clause outputs from one time step as inputs to the next. Direct feedback, however, grows with the clause bank and can make the recurrent input unnecessarily wide. This paper investigates a fixed-width alternative. We combine clause activations by exclusive-OR (XOR) folding, retain the folded bits at two time scales, and threshold them back to a binary state. The resulting design reduces 480 clause activations to 96 recurrent bits. We evaluate the method on a reproducible Boolean finite-state-machine benchmark with explicit transition rules, data splits, and random seeds. Across 144 runs, the compressed model obtains $61.47 \pm 6.74\%$ and $62.94 \pm 9.92\%$ accuracy on the two task families. Raw clause feedback changes these means by less than one percentage point, while increasing the recurrent width tenfold and measured host execution time by $4.38\times$ and $3.71\times$. Gated neural models remain more accurate, and a no-feedback control retaining only short input history achieves comparable or slightly higher accuracy. On this benchmark, folding matches raw feedback within small empirical margins at a much narrower interface; these findings also underscore the critical necessity of no-feedback recurrence controls when benchmarking sequence models.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.06133 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.06133v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.06133 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
What Fits (Into Few Tokens) Doesn't Overfit: Compression and Generalization in ML Research Agents
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026

University of Bristol Team Develops Stochastic Tsetlin Machine for Interpretable Learning
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026