aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a critical safety gap in agentic AI systems where individual steps comply with local rules, yet the cumulative execution violates overarching organizational policies. The authors propose a provenance-aware runtime architecture that evaluates complete execution traces rather than relying on isolated step-level checks to prevent these compositional failures. This work advances AI Safety by addressing the fundamental mismatch between granular monitoring and holistic governance in regulated agentic workflows.
Compositional Policy Violations: When Step-Level Compliance Fails In Agentic AI Workflows
arXiv:2609.18820v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic workflows now make consequential decisions in regulated settings, and the governance placed around them is almost entirely step-scoped: input-output classifiers, per turn rails, and span-level evaluators. The policies organizations actually hold, such as referral thresholds, authority limits, and review requirements, are properties of the whole execution rather than of any one step. This mismatch admits a failure mode we call a Compositional Policy Violation (CPV): every individual step passes its own check while the composed execution violates the governing policy. A predicate over a single step cannot evaluate a property that step does not determine, so no improvement in the accuracy of the step-scoped monitors detects this class. We define CPVs as the failure of step-level compliance to compose, and present a taxonomy of four types: Authority Creep, Threshold Laundering, Cumulative Sum Violation, and Context Collapse. We show that the correct repair for each class is dictated by where the guarded quantity mutates. We then introduce a provenance-aware runtime architecture that evaluates policies over complete execution traces, recomputing guarded quantities from raw provenance rather than the pipeline's derived representation.
Abstract:Agentic workflows now make consequential decisions in regulated settings, and the governance placed around them is almost entirely step-scoped: input-output classifiers, per turn rails, and span-level evaluators. The policies organizations actually hold, such as referral thresholds, authority limits, and review requirements, are properties of the whole execution rather than of any one step. This mismatch admits a failure mode we call a Compositional Policy Violation (CPV): every individual step passes its own check while the composed execution violates the governing policy. A predicate over a single step cannot evaluate a property that step does not determine, so no improvement in the accuracy of the step-scoped monitors detects this class. We define CPVs as the failure of step-level compliance to compose, and present a taxonomy of four types: Authority Creep, Threshold Laundering, Cumulative Sum Violation, and Context Collapse. We show that the correct repair for each class is dictated by where the guarded quantity mutates. We then introduce a provenance-aware runtime architecture that evaluates policies over complete execution traces, recomputing guarded quantities from raw provenance rather than the pipeline's derived representation.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2609.18820 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.18820v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18820 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 277 words
Related coverage
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 18, 2026

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · Jun 15, 2026

Presentation: From Copy-Paste to Composition: Building Agents Like Real Software
InfoQ · Jul 22, 2026
GitLab 19.2 release notes
GitLab · Jul 16, 2026