Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research advances safe human-robot collaboration by integrating model predictive control with impedance-based compliance for non-prehensile pushing tasks. By incorporating an energy tank passivity filter, the system effectively prevents uncontrolled force buildup during external interactions while maintaining precise trajectory tracking. The approach represents a significant step toward robust robotic manipulation in dynamic environments where physical contact is inevitable.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Compliant Non-Prehensile Pushing Manipulation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.25672v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In this paper, we address the challenge of performing non-prehensile pushing operations with a compliant robotic manipulation system. To ensure safe operations in human-populated environments, robots must comply with external physical interactions and exhibit a passive behavior. To achieve this, we extend a state-of-the-art pushing model to integrate it with impedance-controlled robots. We develop a model predictive control framework built upon this model that enables performing compliant pushing through optimal modulation of the robot's position/velocity set-point, jointly realizing the required pushing force and contact point adaptation to obtain a desired object motion. However, external interactions may induce tracking errors causing a consequent potentially indefinite increase of the pushing force. To prevent this, we integrate an energy tank passivity filter that further modulates the robot velocity set-point to guarantee passivity and avoid uncontrolled energy buildup. The proposed method has been rigorously tested in simulation and validated through experiments on two different robotic systems, demonstrating passive compliance during human-robot interactions, and assessing trajectory tracking performance and robustness to variations in the object's physical parameters.

Abstract:In this paper, we address the challenge of performing non-prehensile pushing operations with a compliant robotic manipulation system. To ensure safe operations in human-populated environments, robots must comply with external physical interactions and exhibit a passive behavior. To achieve this, we extend a state-of-the-art pushing model to integrate it with impedance-controlled robots. We develop a model predictive control framework built upon this model that enables performing compliant pushing through optimal modulation of the robot's position/velocity set-point, jointly realizing the required pushing force and contact point adaptation to obtain a desired object motion. However, external interactions may induce tracking errors causing a consequent potentially indefinite increase of the pushing force. To prevent this, we integrate an energy tank passivity filter that further modulates the robot velocity set-point to guarantee passivity and avoid uncontrolled energy buildup. The proposed method has been rigorously tested in simulation and validated through experiments on two different robotic systems, demonstrating passive compliance during human-robot interactions, and assessing trajectory tracking performance and robustness to variations in the object's physical parameters.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2605.25672 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2605.25672v2 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.25672 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 263 words

Related coverage