aiqbench analysis
This paper investigates the theoretical limits of weak proximal oracle methods in convex optimization, specifically addressing whether they can achieve Nesterov-style acceleration. The authors establish negative results via lower bounds, demonstrating that while these oracles reduce individual call costs, they inherently incur a loss in overall oracle complexity compared to standard proximal subgradient methods. These findings clarify the fundamental trade-offs between implementation efficiency and convergence rates for algorithms handling sparse structures in composite optimization problems.
Complexities of Weak Proximal Oracle Methods for Composite Convex Optimization
arXiv:2609.24423v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We consider a standard convex composite optimization problem with either smooth or nonsmooth objective function, and under quadratic growth. In recent years, several works gave algorithms based on a \textit{weak proximal oracle} (WPO) that essentially match in oracle complexities proximal (sub)gradient methods relying on exact prox operations. Importantly, such WPOs, which relax the strong optimality condition of the standard prox operator, may admit much more efficient implementation in terms of runtime when optimal solutions have some sparse structure. A question remained if such WPO-based methods can be accelerated (in the sense of Nesterov's accelerated gradient). In this work we provide a negative answer by establishing lower bounds against both deterministic and randomized methods. Thus, while WPOs can substantially reduce the cost of individual oracle calls, this comes with an inherent loss in oracle complexity. We also provide a new upper-bound for WPO-based nonsmooth convex composite optimization, nearly matching the proximal subgradient method.
Abstract:We consider a standard convex composite optimization problem with either smooth or nonsmooth objective function, and under quadratic growth. In recent years, several works gave algorithms based on a \textit{weak proximal oracle} (WPO) that essentially match in oracle complexities proximal (sub)gradient methods relying on exact prox operations. Importantly, such WPOs, which relax the strong optimality condition of the standard prox operator, may admit much more efficient implementation in terms of runtime when optimal solutions have some sparse structure. A question remained if such WPO-based methods can be accelerated (in the sense of Nesterov's accelerated gradient). In this work we provide a negative answer by establishing lower bounds against both deterministic and randomized methods. Thus, while WPOs can substantially reduce the cost of individual oracle calls, this comes with an inherent loss in oracle complexity. We also provide a new upper-bound for WPO-based nonsmooth convex composite optimization, nearly matching the proximal subgradient method.
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.24423 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2609.24423v1 [math.OC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24423 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words
Related coverage
Accelerated stochastic first-order method for convex optimization under heavy-tailed noise
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026
Anchored Extra-Proximal Methods: Optimal Higher-Order Methods for Monotone Inclusion Problems
arXiv · Sep 26, 2026
Projection-Free Multi-level Algorithms for Stochastic Constrained Compositional Optimization
arXiv · Sep 15, 2026
Solving Finite-sum Coupled Compositional Optimization via Multi-block-Single-probe Estimator
arXiv · Sep 15, 2026