Comparing Trajectories from Positions Alone: Curvature-Based Time Alignment and Drift Error Metric

Abstract:In field robotics, acquiring independent large-scale reference trajectories more accurate than the evaluated estimates remains an open challenge. The domain is widely reliant on Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Relative Pose Error (RPE), computed with automated tools, that rest on assumptions and evaluation parameters rarely made explicit. When unreported, the errors can be misleading and hinder fair comparisons. This paper introduces a trajectory-evaluation protocol for standardized and reliable accuracy assessment in state estimation, localization, and Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM). The approach combines a novel temporal alignment method based on curvature signals with an error metric normalized by travelled distance. We explicitly account for temporal synchronization, sampling alignment, and extrinsic calibration, quantifying their influence through a sensitivity analysis. The proposed protocol contributes to more rigorous, reproducible, and standardized trajectory evaluation.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.14936 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.14936v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14936 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.