Comparing magic state cultivation methods using matrix product states

arXiv:2609.19116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Magic state cultivation prepares high-fidelity magic states at low expected space-time costs; however, the exact performance of some schemes is unsettled due to the difficulty in simulating non-Clifford circuits. Here, we use matrix-product states (MPS) based methods to compute the exact performance of two types of fold-transversal cultivation schemes: (i) the Sahay et al method based on the regular surface code S gate, and (ii) a method we propose based on a partially fault-tolerant fold-transversal S gate. We show that for the former protocol at $d=5$, the $|T\rangle$ output reaches similar logical error rates to the $|S\rangle$ output, traditionally used as a cheap full Clifford proxy. This contrasts with the $\sim10\times$ discrepancy reported for the $d=5$ colour-code scheme of Gidney et al. We also find that our new $d=5$ scheme has $\sim1.3\times$ lower expected space-time cost while still reaching $10^{-9}$ logical error rate. We show that MPS and Clifford-augmented MPS (CAMPS) perform on par with or even better than the recently introduced near-Clifford simulator Clifft on the hardest $d=5$ regular surface code scheme. Additionally, to speed up simulation, we propose a new pre-screening method based on simple Pauli propagation, lowering by up to three orders of magnitude the required number of exact simulations, and use several simulator-agnostic sampling methods such as subset sampling.

Abstract:Magic state cultivation prepares high-fidelity magic states at low expected space-time costs; however, the exact performance of some schemes is unsettled due to the difficulty in simulating non-Clifford circuits. Here, we use matrix-product states (MPS) based methods to compute the exact performance of two types of fold-transversal cultivation schemes: (i) the Sahay et al method based on the regular surface code S gate, and (ii) a method we propose based on a partially fault-tolerant fold-transversal S gate. We show that for the former protocol at $d=5$, the $|T\rangle$ output reaches similar logical error rates to the $|S\rangle$ output, traditionally used as a cheap full Clifford proxy. This contrasts with the $\sim10\times$ discrepancy reported for the $d=5$ colour-code scheme of Gidney et al. We also find that our new $d=5$ scheme has $\sim1.3\times$ lower expected space-time cost while still reaching $10^{-9}$ logical error rate. We show that MPS and Clifford-augmented MPS (CAMPS) perform on par with or even better than the recently introduced near-Clifford simulator Clifft on the hardest $d=5$ regular surface code scheme. Additionally, to speed up simulation, we propose a new pre-screening method based on simple Pauli propagation, lowering by up to three orders of magnitude the required number of exact simulations, and use several simulator-agnostic sampling methods such as subset sampling.

arXiv:2609.19116 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.19116v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19116 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Comparing magic state cultivation methods using matrix product states

Related coverage