Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

CompanionSafe introduces a scalable framework that addresses unique safety risks in AI companions by converting multi-turn interaction failures into localized guardrails. The study reveals that relational harms escalate over longer dialogues, exposing vulnerabilities even in strong LLMs and existing mitigation models. This work provides a practical evaluation-to-mitigation loop essential for developing safer, long-term conversational agents.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CompanionSafe: From Multi-turn Safety Evaluation to Guardrails for AI Companions

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.18095v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI companions provide users with emotional support and ongoing companionship, but their sustained relational interactions also introduce distinct safety risks. Prior work largely targets general harms or specific companion platforms and risk categories, while relying on manually collected conversations, limiting scalable and user-grounded evaluation and mitigation. To address this, we introduce CompanionSafe, a unified evaluation-to-mitigation framework for AI companion safety. Its evaluation component, CompanionEval, provides scalable multi-turn evaluation by constructing 1,300 relationally grounded settings from diverse personas, matched companion characters, and dialogue scenarios across four turn tiers. Its mitigation component, CompanionGuard, converts benchmark-exposed failures into turn-localized supervision for companion-specific risk detection. Our results show that even strong LLMs and existing guard models remain vulnerable to companion-specific relational harms, while both closed- and open-source models exhibit increasing safety risks as interactions become longer. Together, CompanionEval and CompanionGuard form a practical evaluation-to-mitigation loop for AI companion safety, turning relational safety failures exposed during multi-turn interaction into supervision for companion-specific guardrails.

Abstract:AI companions provide users with emotional support and ongoing companionship, but their sustained relational interactions also introduce distinct safety risks. Prior work largely targets general harms or specific companion platforms and risk categories, while relying on manually collected conversations, limiting scalable and user-grounded evaluation and mitigation. To address this, we introduce CompanionSafe, a unified evaluation-to-mitigation framework for AI companion safety. Its evaluation component, CompanionEval, provides scalable multi-turn evaluation by constructing 1,300 relationally grounded settings from diverse personas, matched companion characters, and dialogue scenarios across four turn tiers. Its mitigation component, CompanionGuard, converts benchmark-exposed failures into turn-localized supervision for companion-specific risk detection. Our results show that even strong LLMs and existing guard models remain vulnerable to companion-specific relational harms, while both closed- and open-source models exhibit increasing safety risks as interactions become longer. Together, CompanionEval and CompanionGuard form a practical evaluation-to-mitigation loop for AI companion safety, turning relational safety failures exposed during multi-turn interaction into supervision for companion-specific guardrails.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

arXiv:2610.18095 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.18095v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18095 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 259 words

Related coverage