Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that frozen large language models from different providers can establish a shared communication protocol solely through prompt optimization, without updating their underlying weights. The study reveals how agents can develop a "place value" code to generalize across unseen objects, overcoming the baseline failure where senders lose injective rules and receivers lack sufficient examples. This work highlights the potential for autonomous systems to negotiate efficient information transfer via API endpoints alone, a critical capability for multi-agent AI ecosystems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Communication between Frozen Large Language Models via Prompt Optimization in a Referential Game

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.31989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study communication between two frozen large language models from different providers, with different tokenizers, accessed through their API endpoints. The two play a referential game: one sees an object and describes it in a short fixed-length message over a small alphabet; the other must pick that object out of a candidate set. Neither model's weights are updated. Each agent's prompt is rewritten by an isolated prompt optimizer whose reflection model reads that agent's scored interactions. In the positional setting, optimized prompts carry a shared code that generalizes to held-out objects above a measured no-codebook baseline, including when the memory window is removed. In a second setting, independent per-letter blocks no longer fit within the message, although a whole-object place value code does. The base system fails to establish reliable communication: the sender struggles to retain an injective rule, and the receiver has too few confirmed examples in view. A sender collision penalty, retention of successful interactions, and sequential optimization enable successful place value communication in some runs. Outcomes vary across runs and reflection models. In successful runs, the protocol is written into the optimized prompts, where it can be read and audited directly.

Abstract:We study communication between two frozen large language models from different providers, with different tokenizers, accessed through their API endpoints. The two play a referential game: one sees an object and describes it in a short fixed-length message over a small alphabet; the other must pick that object out of a candidate set. Neither model's weights are updated. Each agent's prompt is rewritten by an isolated prompt optimizer whose reflection model reads that agent's scored interactions. In the positional setting, optimized prompts carry a shared code that generalizes to held-out objects above a measured no-codebook baseline, including when the memory window is removed. In a second setting, independent per-letter blocks no longer fit within the message, although a whole-object place value code does. The base system fails to establish reliable communication: the sender struggles to retain an injective rule, and the receiver has too few confirmed examples in view. A sender collision penalty, retention of successful interactions, and sequential optimization enable successful place value communication in some runs. Outcomes vary across runs and reflection models. In successful runs, the protocol is written into the optimized prompts, where it can be read and audited directly.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

arXiv:2609.31989 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.31989v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31989 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 298 words

Related coverage