aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a neuro-symbolic framework for dynamically selecting relevant expert knowledge by adapting legal theories of evidence to fuzzy cognitive maps. By introducing a novel Bayes-like theorem to de-mix knowledge sources, the method generates query-specific networks that enhance accuracy and scalability in large-scale expert systems. The approach is validated using synthetic data modeling ischemic-stroke risk factors, demonstrating its utility for complex decision-making tasks.
Combining Relevant Expert Knowledge Using Mixtures of Feedback Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
arXiv:2611.05664v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A neuro-symbolic system should combine only relevant answers from expert agents or other knowledge sources. Using only relevant experts for a given input query becomes ever more important for accuracy and scalability as the knowledge network grows and connects ever more knowledge sources. We extend the standard definition of relevance from the legal theory of evidence: An answer is relevant if and only if it is both probative and material for the matter at hand given the knowledge available. We apply this relevancy scheme to mixing the feedback fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) of real or artificial experts. The expert FCM directed causal graphs mix or combine into a common knowledge network. We compare the equilibrium limit-cycle predictions or answers of the experts to the answers of the mixture FCM and then estimate the probative status of answers by their difference or variation. A new Bayes-like theorem de-mixes the knowledge mixture into corresponding posterior-like FCMs that also allow relevancy-based comparisons. The result is a final set of relevancy mixing weights that produces a relevancy-mixed FCM knowledge network for the given query. So different queries produce different relevancy-mixed FCMs. We demonstrate this relevancy approach using generated synthetic FCMs from an actual 13-node expert FCM that models the causes and feedbacks of ischemic-stroke risk.
Abstract:A neuro-symbolic system should combine only relevant answers from expert agents or other knowledge sources. Using only relevant experts for a given input query becomes ever more important for accuracy and scalability as the knowledge network grows and connects ever more knowledge sources. We extend the standard definition of relevance from the legal theory of evidence: An answer is relevant if and only if it is both probative and material for the matter at hand given the knowledge available. We apply this relevancy scheme to mixing the feedback fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) of real or artificial experts. The expert FCM directed causal graphs mix or combine into a common knowledge network. We compare the equilibrium limit-cycle predictions or answers of the experts to the answers of the mixture FCM and then estimate the probative status of answers by their difference or variation. A new Bayes-like theorem de-mixes the knowledge mixture into corresponding posterior-like FCMs that also allow relevancy-based comparisons. The result is a final set of relevancy mixing weights that produces a relevancy-mixed FCM knowledge network for the given query. So different queries produce different relevancy-mixed FCMs. We demonstrate this relevancy approach using generated synthetic FCMs from an actual 13-node expert FCM that models the causes and feedbacks of ischemic-stroke risk.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Symbolic Computation (cs.SC)
arXiv:2611.05664 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2611.05664v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05664 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words
Related coverage
ILM: An AI-Powered Storytelling Educational Tool
arXiv · Oct 9, 2026
MemeLogos: Knowledge-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Harmful Meme Detection
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
AutoLR: Automating the Path from Research to Launch Review in Industrial Recommender Systems
arXiv · Sep 7, 2026
Explore-on-Graph: Hybrid Embedding-LLM Reasoning for Knowledge Graph Question Answering under Incompleteness
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026