aiqbench analysis
This research shifts the focus of autonomous driving evaluation from simple object recognition to decision-level affordance prediction, specifically addressing long-tail failure cases involving rare objects. The authors introduce CoLT-Drive, a new benchmark for testing how models infer feasible vehicle actions in novel scenarios, alongside KPA, a framework that adapts small vision-language models while preserving their general knowledge. These contributions advance the practical deployment of AI in robotics by ensuring systems can safely handle unexpected environmental changes without catastrophic forgetting.
CoLT-Drive: Counterfactual Long-Tail Benchmarking and Knowledge-Preserving Adaptation for Driving Affordance Prediction
arXiv:2609.00242v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-tail autonomous driving failures are often framed as rare-object recognition errors. We argue that this view is incomplete: the decision-critical question is not only whether a model recognizes an unusual object, but whether it infers how that object changes the ego vehicle's feasible high-level actions. We formalize this problem as decision-level driving affordance prediction, where a model maps a front-view image, ego-motion history, and navigation command to a structured longitudinal--lateral meta-action. To evaluate this capability, we introduce CoLT-Drive, a 3,536-sample counterfactual long-tail benchmark that inserts rare objects into otherwise fixed driving scenes and measures whether models predict acceptable action pairs. To improve deployable small VLMs, we propose KPA, a knowledge-preserving adaptation framework that combines structured perception-to-decision prompting, SLERP-based expert merging, and RegMoE, a regime-aware LoRA mixture-of-experts module. KPA preserves the pretrained model's open-world knowledge while allocating lightweight adaptation capacity to different driving decision regimes. Experiments on an in-domain driving split and CoLT-Drive show that KPA achieves 60.8\% pair accuracy on CoLT-Drive, outperforming the pretrained Qwen3-VL-2B baseline (50.3\%) and LoRA SFT (32.4\%) while maintaining competitive in-domain accuracy. Our benchmark and code are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/tangzx2024/CoLT-Drive and https://github.com/tangzhengxu/CoLT-Drive.
Abstract:Long-tail autonomous driving failures are often framed as rare-object recognition errors. We argue that this view is incomplete: the decision-critical question is not only whether a model recognizes an unusual object, but whether it infers how that object changes the ego vehicle's feasible high-level actions. We formalize this problem as decision-level driving affordance prediction, where a model maps a front-view image, ego-motion history, and navigation command to a structured longitudinal--lateral meta-action. To evaluate this capability, we introduce CoLT-Drive, a 3,536-sample counterfactual long-tail benchmark that inserts rare objects into otherwise fixed driving scenes and measures whether models predict acceptable action pairs. To improve deployable small VLMs, we propose KPA, a knowledge-preserving adaptation framework that combines structured perception-to-decision prompting, SLERP-based expert merging, and RegMoE, a regime-aware LoRA mixture-of-experts module. KPA preserves the pretrained model's open-world knowledge while allocating lightweight adaptation capacity to different driving decision regimes. Experiments on an in-domain driving split and CoLT-Drive show that KPA achieves 60.8\% pair accuracy on CoLT-Drive, outperforming the pretrained Qwen3-VL-2B baseline (50.3\%) and LoRA SFT (32.4\%) while maintaining competitive in-domain accuracy. Our benchmark and code are available at this https URL and this https URL.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.00242 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.00242v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00242 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words
Related coverage

Import AI 464: Fables writes GPU kernels; AI automation; and analog computation
Import AI · Jul 6, 2026

The Culture Funnel: You can’t align what isn’t in the data
Cohere · Aug 19, 2026
Coverage-driven alignment - What ‘Teaching Claude Why’ can borrow from AV verification
LessWrong · Jun 8, 2026

Selecting a vector store for Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases
AWS · Sep 17, 2026