aiqbench analysis
This research introduces CoLMIN, a framework that leverages Large Language Models to facilitate multi-decision path negotiation among connected vehicles for cooperative autonomous driving. By employing a Negotiator-Evaluator paradigm and reflective reasoning modules, the system addresses premature convergence issues in complex traffic scenarios to achieve stable consensus on driving intentions. Experimental results in simulation environments indicate significant performance improvements over existing methods, highlighting the potential of LLMs for enhancing safety and reliability in multi-vehicle coordination.
CoLMIN: LLM-based Multi-Decision Path Negotiation for Cooperative Autonomous Driving
arXiv:2609.04807v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-vehicle cooperative autonomous driving enhances the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems through information sharing among connected vehicles, demonstrating significant potential for improving traffic safety. LLM-based approaches leverage strong reasoning capabilities of LLMs to enable effective inter-vehicle negotiation and improve cooperative driving performance. However, driving decisions in complex traffic scenarios are inherently multi-solution in nature. As a result, existing negotiation-based methods often converge prematurely to suboptimal solutions, hindering consensus formation and limiting the practical deployment of cooperative autonomous driving systems. To address this challenge, we propose CoLMIN, the LLM-based multi-decision path negotiation framework for cooperative autonomous driving, achieving stable decision consensus through multi-decision path negotiation and reflective reasoning. To achieve stable and high-quality consensus in cooperative autonomous driving, CoLMIN consists of three key components: (i) an LLM-based Multi-Intent Negotiation module (LMin), which adopts a Negotiator-Evaluator paradigm and generates multiple candidate driving intentions for joint evaluation; (ii) an Evaluation-based Shallow Reflection Module (ESRM), which analyzes negotiation outcomes and provides feedback to guide subsequent negotiations, thereby accelerating consensus formation; and (iii) an LLM-based Deep Reflection Module (LDRM), which performs long-term reflection over negotiation histories to mitigate cognitive fixation and prevent the system from converging to suboptimal solutions. Experimental results in the CARLA simulation environment demonstrate that CoLMIN significantly outperforms existing methods in challenging interactive driving scenarios.
Abstract:Multi-vehicle cooperative autonomous driving enhances the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems through information sharing among connected vehicles, demonstrating significant potential for improving traffic safety. LLM-based approaches leverage strong reasoning capabilities of LLMs to enable effective inter-vehicle negotiation and improve cooperative driving performance. However, driving decisions in complex traffic scenarios are inherently multi-solution in nature. As a result, existing negotiation-based methods often converge prematurely to suboptimal solutions, hindering consensus formation and limiting the practical deployment of cooperative autonomous driving systems. To address this challenge, we propose CoLMIN, the LLM-based multi-decision path negotiation framework for cooperative autonomous driving, achieving stable decision consensus through multi-decision path negotiation and reflective reasoning. To achieve stable and high-quality consensus in cooperative autonomous driving, CoLMIN consists of three key components: (i) an LLM-based Multi-Intent Negotiation module (LMin), which adopts a Negotiator-Evaluator paradigm and generates multiple candidate driving intentions for joint evaluation; (ii) an Evaluation-based Shallow Reflection Module (ESRM), which analyzes negotiation outcomes and provides feedback to guide subsequent negotiations, thereby accelerating consensus formation; and (iii) an LLM-based Deep Reflection Module (LDRM), which performs long-term reflection over negotiation histories to mitigate cognitive fixation and prevent the system from converging to suboptimal solutions. Experimental results in the CARLA simulation environment demonstrate that CoLMIN significantly outperforms existing methods in challenging interactive driving scenarios.
Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2609.04807 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.04807v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04807 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 314 words
Related coverage
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026

Tariffs didn’t bring manufacturing jobs back to the US
The Verge · Jul 27, 2026