Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

CoEvoke introduces a framework for generating high-quality training trajectories in multi-agent systems by using controlled perturbations to elicit corrective feedback and repair behaviors. This approach significantly boosts performance on software engineering benchmarks like ACPBench-Hard and SWE-verifier, demonstrating that engineered difficulties can effectively teach agents how to collaborate under stress. The method offers a practical pathway for improving agent robustness without requiring private reference data or altering the core solving agents.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CoEvoke: Evoking Multi-Agent Collaboration for Trajectory Collection

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.14021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training multi-agent collaboration requires trajectories of checking, feedback, and repair, yet task-solving rollouts may end in immediate approval or repeat unsuccessful attempts without useful correction. We introduce CoEvoke, a cross-domain framework that evokes these interactions during trajectory collection. Controlled perturbations create recoverable difficulties, while restricted reference-based guidance directs investigation. The resulting dataset contains 4,567 reconstructable trajectories over 4,130 software-engineering and reasoning tasks, linking public interactions to evidence, decisions, and task-native outcomes. Separate experiments over 2,287 same-task pairs show feedback increases of 47.72-100 percentage points across seven perturbation groups; guidance has smaller, model-dependent effects. With identical training tasks, decision-record counts, and updates, perturbation-enriched judge training improves ACPBench-Hard success from 35.38% to 42.12% (+6.73 points). SWE verifier training gains 7.60-9.40 points over interface-matched untrained references. Workflow and post-training evaluations preserve task-solving topology with unperturbed inputs and no private-reference guidance. These results support designing collection conditions to obtain corrective supervision that improves collaborative decisions with frozen solving agents.

Abstract:Training multi-agent collaboration requires trajectories of checking, feedback, and repair, yet task-solving rollouts may end in immediate approval or repeat unsuccessful attempts without useful correction. We introduce CoEvoke, a cross-domain framework that evokes these interactions during trajectory collection. Controlled perturbations create recoverable difficulties, while restricted reference-based guidance directs investigation. The resulting dataset contains 4,567 reconstructable trajectories over 4,130 software-engineering and reasoning tasks, linking public interactions to evidence, decisions, and task-native outcomes. Separate experiments over 2,287 same-task pairs show feedback increases of 47.72-100 percentage points across seven perturbation groups; guidance has smaller, model-dependent effects. With identical training tasks, decision-record counts, and updates, perturbation-enriched judge training improves ACPBench-Hard success from 35.38% to 42.12% (+6.73 points). SWE verifier training gains 7.60-9.40 points over interface-matched untrained references. Workflow and post-training evaluations preserve task-solving topology with unperturbed inputs and no private-reference guidance. These results support designing collection conditions to obtain corrective supervision that improves collaborative decisions with frozen solving agents.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2610.14021 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.14021v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14021 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words

Related coverage