aiqbench analysis
CodeTD addresses the critical challenge of hallucination in AI coding assistants by leveraging topological data analysis on attention maps to predict code correctness before execution. This method offers a novel, pre-runtime safety mechanism that significantly outperforms existing baselines across multiple programming languages and model sizes. By quantifying mismatches between prompts and generated outputs through topological patterns, it provides a robust framework for ensuring the reliability of AI-generated software.
CodeTD: Topology of Attention Detects Hallucinations in Code LLMs
arXiv:2609.07779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI-code assistant tools become widespread, automatic assessment of the correctness of generated code becomes a significant challenge. Code LLMs are prone to hallucinations, which may lead to code that does not solve the required problem, or even to code with severe security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce CodeTD -- the first approach to pre-execution assessment of code correctness based on topological data analysis (TDA) of Code LLMs' attention maps. Our method quantifies prompt-generation mismatch using topological patterns of attention maps. We carry out experiments with common benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, BigCodeBench, MultiPL-E), 5 programming languages and 10 Code LLMs of size up to 34B parameters. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms recent baselines. Moreover, CodeTD is transferable between coding benchmarks.
Abstract:As AI-code assistant tools become widespread, automatic assessment of the correctness of generated code becomes a significant challenge. Code LLMs are prone to hallucinations, which may lead to code that does not solve the required problem, or even to code with severe security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce CodeTD -- the first approach to pre-execution assessment of code correctness based on topological data analysis (TDA) of Code LLMs' attention maps. Our method quantifies prompt-generation mismatch using topological patterns of attention maps. We carry out experiments with common benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, BigCodeBench, MultiPL-E), 5 programming languages and 10 Code LLMs of size up to 34B parameters. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms recent baselines. Moreover, CodeTD is transferable between coding benchmarks.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.07779 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2609.07779v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07779 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 228 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
Detecting Hallucination in LLMs: Tracing the Topological Signatures of Impaired Context Sharing
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026

Infected Vibe-Coding: How Does an AI react to a Prompt Injection from a Different AI?
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026