aiqbench analysis
CodeForge-MA addresses critical limitations in current code generation models by integrating execution verification and multi-agent refinement to ensure functional correctness across multiple languages. The framework leverages language-conditioned LoRA adapters and test-driven reinforcement learning to maintain performance without altering the base model's inference weights. This approach represents a significant advancement in making LLMs more reliable for practical software development tasks.
CodeForge-MA: Execution-Verified Multi-Agent Learning with Language-Conditioned LoRA for Multilingual Code Generation
arXiv:2610.05481v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models for code generation often fail on execution, multilingual coverage, and contamination control, especially under frozen backbone constraints. We present CodeForge-MA, a unified framework that improves code synthesis through a multi-agent data forge, execution verified reinforced instruction tuning, and a language conditioned mixture of LoRA adapters. Four specialized agents, Composer, Reviewer, Executor, and Curator, iteratively refine instruction code pairs, validate them with tests, and filter duplicates and benchmark leakage. During training, we combine masked supervised fine tuning with a test driven reinforcement objective to align generations with executable correctness. For the larger model, we use sparse expert routing over low rank adapters to improve cross language transfer while keeping the base model unchanged at inference. Experiments show that joint data, objective, and adapter design yields robust gains across programming languages.
Abstract:Large language models for code generation often fail on execution, multilingual coverage, and contamination control, especially under frozen backbone constraints. We present CodeForge-MA, a unified framework that improves code synthesis through a multi-agent data forge, execution verified reinforced instruction tuning, and a language conditioned mixture of LoRA adapters. Four specialized agents, Composer, Reviewer, Executor, and Curator, iteratively refine instruction code pairs, validate them with tests, and filter duplicates and benchmark leakage. During training, we combine masked supervised fine tuning with a test driven reinforcement objective to align generations with executable correctness. For the larger model, we use sparse expert routing over low rank adapters to improve cross language transfer while keeping the base model unchanged at inference. Experiments show that joint data, objective, and adapter design yields robust gains across programming languages.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.05481 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.05481v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05481 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words
Related coverage

A Candid Abacus AI Review: The All-in-One AI Platform for Professionals & Enterprises
KDnuggets · Sep 10, 2026

Mastering Agentic Techniques: AI Agent Reinforcement Learning
NVIDIA · Jul 1, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026