Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper presents Fin-Thinker, a 9B-parameter model that reasons over candlestick charts by writing and running code to locate chart elements and compute results, with a dataset of 32K trajectories and a benchmark that scores answer correctness, code execution, and evidence grounding separately. The grounding metric matters because it tests whether a correct answer is actually supported by the chart, not just lucky. Readers should weigh the reported gains against the baselines used, since the comparisons are limited to specific models and a benchmark the authors built themselves.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Code-Interactive Visual Reasoning for Financial Candlestick Understanding

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.16587v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial candlestick understanding requires locating visual elements, aligning them across trading dates and panels, and combining observations through numerical and financial reasoning. Answer accuracy alone does not reveal whether predictions are supported by chart evidence. We introduce Code-Interactive Financial Candlestick Reasoning and present Fin-Thinker, a model based on Qwen3.5-9B that generates and executes code to acquire evidence and perform computations. The model uses the returned observations to guide subsequent reasoning. To train these capabilities, we construct FinKLine-32K with 32,184 replay-verified code-observation trajectories collected through teacher-guided student exploration. These include successful solutions with and without error recovery. Our three-stage training framework combines foundational visual-code fine-tuning, financial process supervision of successful reasoning and corrective continuations, and execution-feedback reinforcement learning. For evaluation, we introduce FinKLineBench with 1,200 questions across 138 financial task types to assess answer correctness, code execution, and evidence grounding separately. On FinKLineBench, Fin-Thinker improves strict accuracy by 13.1 and 33.2 percentage points over the best-performing direct-answer baseline among those evaluated and its base model with sandbox access, respectively. Training-stage ablations further show that financial process supervision and execution-feedback reinforcement learning yield successive improvements in both answer accuracy and GPT-5.6-judged grounded accuracy.

Abstract:Financial candlestick understanding requires locating visual elements, aligning them across trading dates and panels, and combining observations through numerical and financial reasoning. Answer accuracy alone does not reveal whether predictions are supported by chart evidence. We introduce Code-Interactive Financial Candlestick Reasoning and present Fin-Thinker, a model based on Qwen3.5-9B that generates and executes code to acquire evidence and perform computations. The model uses the returned observations to guide subsequent reasoning. To train these capabilities, we construct FinKLine-32K with 32,184 replay-verified code-observation trajectories collected through teacher-guided student exploration. These include successful solutions with and without error recovery. Our three-stage training framework combines foundational visual-code fine-tuning, financial process supervision of successful reasoning and corrective continuations, and execution-feedback reinforcement learning. For evaluation, we introduce FinKLineBench with 1,200 questions across 138 financial task types to assess answer correctness, code execution, and evidence grounding separately. On FinKLineBench, Fin-Thinker improves strict accuracy by 13.1 and 33.2 percentage points over the best-performing direct-answer baseline among those evaluated and its base model with sandbox access, respectively. Training-stage ablations further show that financial process supervision and execution-feedback reinforcement learning yield successive improvements in both answer accuracy and GPT-5.6-judged grounded accuracy.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.16587 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.16587v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16587 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words

Related coverage