Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces Cocoreli, an architectural framework that structurally couples the detection of missing information with the blocking of autonomous agent execution to prevent unsafe actions. By enforcing missing data as a hard precondition rather than relying solely on model capabilities or reasoning chains, the system eliminates hallucinated behaviors in complex task environments. This work highlights a critical shift from improving detection rates to implementing architectural safeguards for reliable AI collaboration.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

COCORELI: Enforcing Execution Preconditions for Reliable Collaborative Instruction Following

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2509.04470v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autonomous agents executing human instructions must operate reliably even when instructions are incomplete. While recent approaches improve detection of missing information, detection alone is insufficient: agents often proceed to execution even after recognizing underspecification, leading to incorrect or unsafe actions. We identify this failure as arising from a lack of coupling between detection and execution, and propose that reliable behavior requires enforcing missing information as a precondition for action. We instantiate this principle in Cocoreli, a modular architecture that represents task structure, tracks missing information, and blocks execution until required details are resolved through targeted clarification. In Cocoreli, detection and prevention are structurally coupled: detecting a missing parameter simultaneously blocks execution. We evaluate Cocoreli in a controlled construction environment isolating underspecification and sequential execution. Cocoreli blocks execution under unresolved specifications by construction, eliminating hallucinated actions. In contrast, chain-of-thought, prompt-chaining, and ReAct-style reasoning may still execute under incomplete specifications despite high detection rates. The same representation supports abstraction and reuse, and generalizes to API workflow tasks on ToolBench. These results show that reliable collaborative execution requires architectural enforcement, not just model capability

Abstract:Autonomous agents executing human instructions must operate reliably even when instructions are incomplete. While recent approaches improve detection of missing information, detection alone is insufficient: agents often proceed to execution even after recognizing underspecification, leading to incorrect or unsafe actions. We identify this failure as arising from a lack of coupling between detection and execution, and propose that reliable behavior requires enforcing missing information as a precondition for action. We instantiate this principle in Cocoreli, a modular architecture that represents task structure, tracks missing information, and blocks execution until required details are resolved through targeted clarification. In Cocoreli, detection and prevention are structurally coupled: detecting a missing parameter simultaneously blocks execution. We evaluate Cocoreli in a controlled construction environment isolating underspecification and sequential execution. Cocoreli blocks execution under unresolved specifications by construction, eliminating hallucinated actions. In contrast, chain-of-thought, prompt-chaining, and ReAct-style reasoning may still execute under incomplete specifications despite high detection rates. The same representation supports abstraction and reuse, and generalizes to API workflow tasks on ToolBench. These results show that reliable collaborative execution requires architectural enforcement, not just model capability

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2509.04470 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2509.04470v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.04470 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.sigdial-1.36 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words

Related coverage