aiqbench analysis
This research introduces Cluster-DAGs as a flexible prior knowledge framework to enhance causal discovery in high-dimensional settings, effectively addressing limitations of existing methods with complex dependencies. By adapting constraint-based algorithms like Cluster-PC and Cluster-FCI, the study demonstrates improved performance over baselines that lack prior structural information, offering a significant step forward for modeling intricate scientific systems.
Cluster-Dags as Powerful Background Knowledge For Causal Discovery
arXiv:2512.10032v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Finding cause-effect relationships is of key importance in science. Causal discovery aims to recover a graph from data that succinctly describes these cause-effect relationships. However, current methods face several challenges, especially when dealing with high-dimensional data and complex dependencies. Incorporating prior knowledge about the system can aid causal discovery. In this work, we leverage Cluster-DAGs as a prior knowledge framework to warm-start causal discovery. We show that Cluster-DAGs offer greater flexibility than existing approaches based on tiered background knowledge and introduce two modified constraint-based algorithms, Cluster-PC and Cluster-FCI, for causal discovery in the fully and partially observed setting, respectively. Empirical evaluation on simulated data demonstrates that Cluster-PC and Cluster-FCI outperform their respective baselines without prior knowledge.
Abstract:Finding cause-effect relationships is of key importance in science. Causal discovery aims to recover a graph from data that succinctly describes these cause-effect relationships. However, current methods face several challenges, especially when dealing with high-dimensional data and complex dependencies. Incorporating prior knowledge about the system can aid causal discovery. In this work, we leverage Cluster-DAGs as a prior knowledge framework to warm-start causal discovery. We show that Cluster-DAGs offer greater flexibility than existing approaches based on tiered background knowledge and introduce two modified constraint-based algorithms, Cluster-PC and Cluster-FCI, for causal discovery in the fully and partially observed setting, respectively. Empirical evaluation on simulated data demonstrates that Cluster-PC and Cluster-FCI outperform their respective baselines without prior knowledge.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2512.10032 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2512.10032v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.10032 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 214 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
The Next Swan: Frank Ramsey, Variable Hypotheticals, and the Bet on Induction
LessWrong · Jun 8, 2026