aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the modality gap in LLM-based automatic speech recognition by demonstrating that minimal paired audio data (under 4 hours) significantly outperforms text-only adaptation strategies. The findings suggest a highly efficient path for domain alignment, allowing systems to leverage large language models while retaining crucial acoustic signals with drastically reduced data requirements.
Closing the Speech-Text Gap with Limited Audio for Effective Domain Adaptation in LLM-Based ASR
arXiv:2604.06487v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conventional end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems rely on paired speech-text data for domain adaptation. Recent LLM-based ASR architectures connect a speech encoder to a large language model via a projection module, enabling adaptation with text-only data. However, this introduces a modality gap, as the LLM is not exposed to the noisy representations produced by the speech projector. We investigate whether small amounts of speech can mitigate this mismatch. We compare three strategies: text-only adaptation, paired speech-text adaptation, and mixed batching (MB), which combines both. Experiments in in-domain and out-of-domain settings show that even limited speech consistently improves performance. Notably, MB using only 10% of the target-domain (less than 4 hours) speech achieves word error rates comparable to, or better than, conventional ASR fine-tuning with the full dataset, indicating that small amounts of speech provide a strong modality-alignment signal.
Abstract:Conventional end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems rely on paired speech-text data for domain adaptation. Recent LLM-based ASR architectures connect a speech encoder to a large language model via a projection module, enabling adaptation with text-only data. However, this introduces a modality gap, as the LLM is not exposed to the noisy representations produced by the speech projector. We investigate whether small amounts of speech can mitigate this mismatch. We compare three strategies: text-only adaptation, paired speech-text adaptation, and mixed batching (MB), which combines both. Experiments in in-domain and out-of-domain settings show that even limited speech consistently improves performance. Notably, MB using only 10% of the target-domain (less than 4 hours) speech achieves word error rates comparable to, or better than, conventional ASR fine-tuning with the full dataset, indicating that small amounts of speech provide a strong modality-alignment signal.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2604.06487 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2604.06487v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.06487 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 232 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

2026.9: There's room on this bus
Home Assistant · Sep 2, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026