aiqbench analysis
This research experimentally demonstrates how two-copy collective measurements on superconducting qubits can close the precision gap to the Holevo bound in specific three-parameter quantum estimation models. The study confirms that ultimate quantum sensing limits are attainable with finite resources when the measurement strategy aligns with the model's structure, even under controlled noise.
Closing a single-copy gap to the Holevo bound with two-copy measurements
arXiv:2609.36874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Holevo Cram\'{e}r-Rao bound sets the asymptotically attainable precision of quantum multiparameter estimation, but its attainability with finite quantum state copies remains unresolved in general. While a gap between the single-copy optimum and the Holevo bound persists at any finite copy number for two-parameter estimation models, the higher-parameter case has remained open. Here we disprove universal finite-copy gap persistence beyond two parameters by constructing a three-parameter rank-two model whose Holevo bound is unattainable with one copy but attained exactly with two. We further prove finite-copy persistence for full-rank models with any number of parameters. We then experimentally implement the two-copy collective measurement for the constructed model using superconducting qubits. We observe a two-copy estimation error below the single-copy and separate-measurement bounds determined from state tomography. By introducing controlled depolarization, we show that this precision advantage persists over a finite noise range. Our results connect the attainability of ultimate quantum precision to the structure of the multiparameter estimation model and the resources available for collective measurements.
Abstract:The Holevo Cramér-Rao bound sets the asymptotically attainable precision of quantum multiparameter estimation, but its attainability with finite quantum state copies remains unresolved in general. While a gap between the single-copy optimum and the Holevo bound persists at any finite copy number for two-parameter estimation models, the higher-parameter case has remained open. Here we disprove universal finite-copy gap persistence beyond two parameters by constructing a three-parameter rank-two model whose Holevo bound is unattainable with one copy but attained exactly with two. We further prove finite-copy persistence for full-rank models with any number of parameters. We then experimentally implement the two-copy collective measurement for the constructed model using superconducting qubits. We observe a two-copy estimation error below the single-copy and separate-measurement bounds determined from state tomography. By introducing controlled depolarization, we show that this precision advantage persists over a finite noise range. Our results connect the attainability of ultimate quantum precision to the structure of the multiparameter estimation model and the resources available for collective measurements.
arXiv:2609.36874 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.36874v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36874 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words
Related coverage

Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation
Quantum Journal · Aug 13, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026

Richard Hamming, The Man Who Made Computers Reliable
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 17, 2026