Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces CLFEC, a new benchmark that unifies linguistic and factual error correction for Chinese professional writing, addressing the common co-occurrence of these issues in domains like law and medicine. The study demonstrates that joint correction within a single context outperforms decoupled pipelines and highlights critical challenges such as model over-correction and the necessity for evidence grounding in factual repair. Ultimately, this work provides practical guidance for improving the robustness of proofreading systems and LLM-based editing workflows.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CLFEC: A New Task for Unified Linguistic and Factual Error Correction in paragraph-level Chinese Professional Writing

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2602.23845v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Chinese text correction has traditionally focused on spelling and grammar, while factual error correction is usually treated separately. However, in paragraph-level Chinese professional writing, linguistic (word/grammar/punctuation) and factual errors frequently co-occur and interact, while many draft-level errors are sparsely observable in published texts after editorial review, making unified correction both necessary and controlled benchmark construction essential. This paper introduces CLFEC (Chinese Linguistic \& Factual Error Correction), a new task for joint linguistic and factual correction. We construct a mixed, multi-domain Chinese professional writing dataset spanning current affairs, finance, law, and medicine. We then conduct a systematic study of LLM-based correction paradigms, from prompting to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and agentic workflows. The analysis reveals practical challenges, including limited generalization of specialized correction models, the need for evidence grounding for factual repair, the difficulty of mixed-error paragraphs, and over-correction on clean inputs. Results further show that handling linguistic and factual errors within the same context outperforms decoupled pipelines, and that agentic workflows can be effective with suitable backbone models. Overall, CLFEC provides a new benchmark for Chinese text correction research and practical guidance for proofreading systems.

Abstract:Chinese text correction has traditionally focused on spelling and grammar, while factual error correction is usually treated separately. However, in paragraph-level Chinese professional writing, linguistic (word/grammar/punctuation) and factual errors frequently co-occur and interact, while many draft-level errors are sparsely observable in published texts after editorial review, making unified correction both necessary and controlled benchmark construction essential. This paper introduces CLFEC (Chinese Linguistic \& Factual Error Correction), a new task for joint linguistic and factual correction. We construct a mixed, multi-domain Chinese professional writing dataset spanning current affairs, finance, law, and medicine. We then conduct a systematic study of LLM-based correction paradigms, from prompting to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and agentic workflows. The analysis reveals practical challenges, including limited generalization of specialized correction models, the need for evidence grounding for factual repair, the difficulty of mixed-error paragraphs, and over-correction on clean inputs. Results further show that handling linguistic and factual errors within the same context outperforms decoupled pipelines, and that agentic workflows can be effective with suitable backbone models. Overall, CLFEC provides a new benchmark for Chinese text correction research and practical guidance for proofreading systems.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2602.23845 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2602.23845v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.23845 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 277 words

Related coverage