Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

CleanScore introduces a rigorous black-box auditing framework that isolates genuine model capability from mere memorization or exposure to benchmark questions using fresh paraphrasing controls. By quantifying the invisible portion of performance gains, this methodology provides essential tools for evaluating data contamination and ensuring the integrity of standard evaluation suites like GSM8K and ARC-Challenge. This work advances the field's ability to distinguish between true reasoning improvements and artifacts of training data leakage without requiring access to model weights or training corpora.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CleanScore: Black-Box Benchmark Audits with Negative Controls and Sensitivity Bounds

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.22183v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Public benchmark scores may reflect skill, prior exposure to the questions, or both, and for most models the training data are unknown. We present CleanScore, a black-box audit using scored outputs only. Each benchmark question becomes a parent item with one public form and two independently written fresh forms preserving its numbers, facts and answer. The audit reports an interval for the public-form advantage rather than a verdict, and a private negative-control bank with an explicit transport radius separates exposure from ordinary form mismatch. A registered controlled-exposure experiment detects planted exposure and stays quiet under fresh-form exposure. A registered audit of five open models on 200 GSM8K and 200 ARC-Challenge items finds no exposure-consistent advantage, bounding surface-form inflation below five points. Registered positive controls then bound what such a null can mean. Leaking an item raises accuracy on paraphrases the model never saw almost as much as on the leaked wording, leaving 52% to 110% of the effect invisible to a paraphrase audit. On ARC a planted 49-point advantage shows an observable gap of -0.020, and about 20 points survive rewriting stem and options, across four training seeds. A surface-form null bounds far less than the phrase contamination audit implies.

Abstract:Public benchmark scores may reflect skill, prior exposure to the questions, or both, and for most models the training data are unknown. We present CleanScore, a black-box audit using scored outputs only. Each benchmark question becomes a parent item with one public form and two independently written fresh forms preserving its numbers, facts and answer. The audit reports an interval for the public-form advantage rather than a verdict, and a private negative-control bank with an explicit transport radius separates exposure from ordinary form mismatch. A registered controlled-exposure experiment detects planted exposure and stays quiet under fresh-form exposure. A registered audit of five open models on 200 GSM8K and 200 ARC-Challenge items finds no exposure-consistent advantage, bounding surface-form inflation below five points. Registered positive controls then bound what such a null can mean. Leaking an item raises accuracy on paraphrases the model never saw almost as much as on the leaked wording, leaving 52% to 110% of the effect invisible to a paraphrase audit. On ARC a planted 49-point advantage shows an observable gap of -0.020, and about 20 points survive rewriting stem and options, across four training seeds. A surface-form null bounds far less than the phrase contamination audit implies.

43 pages, 15 figures, 21 tables. Item bank, code and pre-registrations released

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)

I.2.7; I.2.6; G.3

arXiv:2609.22183 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.22183v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22183 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 309 words

Related coverage