aiqbench analysis
This research advances the theoretical understanding of binary classification by introducing abstention mechanisms that strictly adhere to class-conditional error constraints. The authors provide distribution-free minimax rates and practical surrogate-loss formulations, enabling neural networks to minimize uncertainty while maintaining safety thresholds. This work is significant for deploying reliable AI systems in high-stakes environments where false positives or negatives must be rigorously bounded.
Classification with Abstention Under Class-Conditional Error Constraints
arXiv:2609.22632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study binary classification with abstention under separate class-conditional error constraints, with the objective of minimizing abstention while keeping both errors below prescribed thresholds. We characterize the distribution-free minimax rate of excess abstention risk, up to logarithmic factors, in terms of the complexity of the hypothesis class and the sample size. To make the framework amenable to computation with models such as neural networks, we introduce surrogate-loss formulations and derive finite-sample guarantees for excess surrogate ambiguity risk. We formulate the resulting learning task as a constrained optimization problem and characterize its computational complexity in the convex setting. Finally, we evaluate our approach on various datasets and compare its performance with a competing method for this problem.
Abstract:We study binary classification with abstention under separate class-conditional error constraints, with the objective of minimizing abstention while keeping both errors below prescribed thresholds. We characterize the distribution-free minimax rate of excess abstention risk, up to logarithmic factors, in terms of the complexity of the hypothesis class and the sample size. To make the framework amenable to computation with models such as neural networks, we introduce surrogate-loss formulations and derive finite-sample guarantees for excess surrogate ambiguity risk. We formulate the resulting learning task as a constrained optimization problem and characterize its computational complexity in the convex setting. Finally, we evaluate our approach on various datasets and compare its performance with a competing method for this problem.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.22632 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.22632v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22632 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 213 words
Related coverage

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · Jun 15, 2026
On Rate-Optimal Partitioning Classification from Observable and from Privatised Data
arXiv · Jun 15, 2026

New framework classifies Matrix Product Quantum Channels
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 17, 2026