aiqbench analysis
This study establishes a fundamental classical bound on the information rate of dissipative quantum neurons, demonstrating that while dephasing sharpens activation, it cannot exceed the throughput achievable by a classical two-state jump process. The research provides a hardware-aware benchmark for finite-time quantum neural processing, clarifying the limits of noise-enhanced activation versus actual operational information throughput.
Classical Bound on the Fisher Information Rate of a Dephasing-Enhanced Quantum Neuron
arXiv:2609.35076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dephasing can sharpen the activation of a dissipative quantum neuron, but a stationary response does not determine how much input information its output delivers per unit time. For a single qubit with partial-reset updates at rate $\nu$, we derive the threshold response bandwidth and the exact local Fisher information rate of the complete record from repeated projective readouts, including their backaction. Near the activation threshold, the rate obeys $\mathcal R\leq\nu(1-s)(1+s)^2/2\leq16\nu/27$, where $s$ is the retained amplitude of each update. For every fixed finite Markovian dephasing rate, optimization over the readout interval and $s$ gives the same supremum, approached at $s=1/3$ with arbitrarily rapid ideal readout. A finite measurement dead time instead selects a finite optimal interval, which we obtain by a dimensionless two-parameter optimization. The ideal bound is saturated by a classical two-state jump process: quantum coherence changes finite-cadence performance but cannot raise the optimized bound. These results separate noise-enhanced activation from the operational information throughput of a quantum neuron and provide a hardware-aware benchmark for finite-time quantum neural processing.
Abstract:Dephasing can sharpen the activation of a dissipative quantum neuron, but a stationary response does not determine how much input information its output delivers per unit time. For a single qubit with partial-reset updates at rate $\nu$, we derive the threshold response bandwidth and the exact local Fisher information rate of the complete record from repeated projective readouts, including their backaction. Near the activation threshold, the rate obeys $\mathcal R\leq\nu(1-s)(1+s)^2/2\leq16\nu/27$, where $s$ is the retained amplitude of each update. For every fixed finite Markovian dephasing rate, optimization over the readout interval and $s$ gives the same supremum, approached at $s=1/3$ with arbitrarily rapid ideal readout. A finite measurement dead time instead selects a finite optimal interval, which we obtain by a dimensionless two-parameter optimization. The ideal bound is saturated by a classical two-state jump process: quantum coherence changes finite-cadence performance but cannot raise the optimized bound. These results separate noise-enhanced activation from the operational information throughput of a quantum neuron and provide a hardware-aware benchmark for finite-time quantum neural processing.
arXiv:2609.35076 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.35076v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35076 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage

Time crystals scale quantum precision with system size—up to N cubed
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 1, 2026

Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation
Quantum Journal · Aug 13, 2026

Researchers Link Quantum Boost to Measurable Optical Signal
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 17, 2026

Researchers Bound Quantum Channel Entropy Contraction Rates
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 25, 2026