Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces Class-Balanced Softmax (CBS), a Bayesian-inspired logit adjustment designed to resolve the "preference issue" where models underperform on tail classes in imbalanced datasets. By offering a computationally lightweight alternative to existing rebalancing techniques, CBS aims to improve generalization gaps across large-scale benchmarks without requiring complex architectural changes.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Class-Balanced Softmax: A Bayes Theory-Based Method for Long-Tailed Recognition

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.22258v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep learning models using traditional softmax classifiers have achieved remarkable success in various classification tasks. However, their performance degrades significantly on imbalanced datasets. Although Balanced Softmax is widely adopted as a state-of-the-art rebalancing method, it possesses inherent limitations, such as yielding disproportionately lower testing accuracy for tail classes. To mitigate these shortcomings, we propose the Class-Balanced Softmax (CBS). Rooted in a theoretical Bayesian framework and a heuristic power-law assumption, the CBS is a simple logit adjustment that is computationally inexpensive and easily integrated into existing pipelines. Furthermore, we characterise a fundamental phenomenon in models trained on imbalanced data, termed the preference issue, wherein models exhibit higher training error and a larger generalisation gap for classes with limited data. To quantify this issue, we introduce a novel metric and demonstrate that CBS effectively mitigates the preference issue. Extensive experiments on large-scale benchmarks show that CBS is highly scalable and outperforms existing methods, including Balanced Softmax.

Abstract:Deep learning models using traditional softmax classifiers have achieved remarkable success in various classification tasks. However, their performance degrades significantly on imbalanced datasets. Although Balanced Softmax is widely adopted as a state-of-the-art rebalancing method, it possesses inherent limitations, such as yielding disproportionately lower testing accuracy for tail classes. To mitigate these shortcomings, we propose the Class-Balanced Softmax (CBS). Rooted in a theoretical Bayesian framework and a heuristic power-law assumption, the CBS is a simple logit adjustment that is computationally inexpensive and easily integrated into existing pipelines. Furthermore, we characterise a fundamental phenomenon in models trained on imbalanced data, termed the preference issue, wherein models exhibit higher training error and a larger generalisation gap for classes with limited data. To quantify this issue, we introduce a novel metric and demonstrate that CBS effectively mitigates the preference issue. Extensive experiments on large-scale benchmarks show that CBS is highly scalable and outperforms existing methods, including Balanced Softmax.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2607.22258 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.22258v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22258 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words

Related coverage