aiqbench analysis
This research presents CIVI, a diagnostic framework evaluating frontier search agents against human baselines in critical public-sector contexts. By decomposing failures into distinct modes, the study reveals that retrieval limitations account for the majority of errors rather than gaps in model knowledge. This work is essential for ensuring the reliability and safety of AI systems deployed in government and civic information domains.
CIVI: A Framework for Diagnosing Search Agent Failures in Civic Information
arXiv:2609.08094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly deployed in public-sector settings, where incorrect guidance can cause irreversible harm. We introduce CIVI, the first framework for diagnosing search agent failures in civic information. Its benchmark instantiation jointly spans cross-national, interjurisdictional government contexts (federal, state, and local) and functional categories from an internationally adopted United Nations standard. We evaluate ten frontier search agents and find that none matches an attentive human baseline. Alongside accuracy, CIVI measures search invocation rate, selective no-search accuracy, and how often agents cite authoritative government sources. To perform this diagnosis, we introduce ARISE, which decomposes agentic search failures into four mutually exclusive modes, isolated via source-injection ablation. ARISE attributes 72.1% of all observed failures to retrieval-bound causes rather than to gaps in the models' parametric knowledge.
Abstract:Large Language Models are increasingly deployed in public-sector settings, where incorrect guidance can cause irreversible harm. We introduce CIVI, the first framework for diagnosing search agent failures in civic information. Its benchmark instantiation jointly spans cross-national, interjurisdictional government contexts (federal, state, and local) and functional categories from an internationally adopted United Nations standard. We evaluate ten frontier search agents and find that none matches an attentive human baseline. Alongside accuracy, CIVI measures search invocation rate, selective no-search accuracy, and how often agents cite authoritative government sources. To perform this diagnosis, we introduce ARISE, which decomposes agentic search failures into four mutually exclusive modes, isolated via source-injection ablation. ARISE attributes 72.1% of all observed failures to retrieval-bound causes rather than to gaps in the models' parametric knowledge.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.08094 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.08094v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.08094 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words
Related coverage
Root-Cause Attribution Is a Search Problem: Continual Search for Long-Horizon Agent Failures
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026

An Organizational Second Brain: Building an AI That Learns From Experts
Meta Engineering · Sep 2, 2026
Self-Evolving Search Index
arXiv · Sep 18, 2026
Early Diagnosis of Wasted Computation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems via Failure-Aware Observability
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026