Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research presents CIVI, a diagnostic framework evaluating frontier search agents against human baselines in critical public-sector contexts. By decomposing failures into distinct modes, the study reveals that retrieval limitations account for the majority of errors rather than gaps in model knowledge. This work is essential for ensuring the reliability and safety of AI systems deployed in government and civic information domains.
Sources coveringarXiv, AWS
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CIVI: A Framework for Diagnosing Search Agent Failures in Civic Information

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.08094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly deployed in public-sector settings, where incorrect guidance can cause irreversible harm. We introduce CIVI, the first framework for diagnosing search agent failures in civic information. Its benchmark instantiation jointly spans cross-national, interjurisdictional government contexts (federal, state, and local) and functional categories from an internationally adopted United Nations standard. We evaluate ten frontier search agents and find that none matches an attentive human baseline. Alongside accuracy, CIVI measures search invocation rate, selective no-search accuracy, and how often agents cite authoritative government sources. To perform this diagnosis, we introduce ARISE, which decomposes agentic search failures into four mutually exclusive modes, isolated via source-injection ablation. ARISE attributes 72.1% of all observed failures to retrieval-bound causes rather than to gaps in the models' parametric knowledge.

Abstract:Large Language Models are increasingly deployed in public-sector settings, where incorrect guidance can cause irreversible harm. We introduce CIVI, the first framework for diagnosing search agent failures in civic information. Its benchmark instantiation jointly spans cross-national, interjurisdictional government contexts (federal, state, and local) and functional categories from an internationally adopted United Nations standard. We evaluate ten frontier search agents and find that none matches an attentive human baseline. Alongside accuracy, CIVI measures search invocation rate, selective no-search accuracy, and how often agents cite authoritative government sources. To perform this diagnosis, we introduce ARISE, which decomposes agentic search failures into four mutually exclusive modes, isolated via source-injection ablation. ARISE attributes 72.1% of all observed failures to retrieval-bound causes rather than to gaps in the models' parametric knowledge.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.08094 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.08094v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.08094 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words

Related coverage