aiqbench analysis
This study provides a rigorous circuit-level comparison of BB and tricycle qLDPC codes concatenated with GKP states, demonstrating that analog-informed decoding significantly lowers the squeezing threshold required for fault tolerance. The findings establish critical performance metrics for scalable quantum error correction architectures under realistic noise models.
Circuit-level benchmarks of GKP-concatenated qLDPC Codes
arXiv:2609.35282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scalable fault-tolerant quantum error correction based on Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) codes requires finite-rate outer codes that can exploit analog GKP information under realistic circuit noise. However, quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) outer codes have not been systematically compared as candidates for circuit-level GKP concatenation. Here, we benchmark BB and tricycle codes using a unified simulation framework that progresses from code-capacity noise to repeated noisy syndrome extraction and schedule-resolved displacement propagation. Across all three noise models, analog-informed belief-propagation with ordered-statistics decoding (BP-OSD) yields higher finite-size crossing estimates than hard-decision decoding. In the full circuit model, the analog-informed crossings are \(\sigma_{\mathrm{th}}\simeq0.212\) for the selected BB sequence and \(0.142\) for the tricycle sequence, corresponding to squeezing requirements of approximately \(10.46\,\mathrm{dB}\) and \(13.94\,\mathrm{dB}\), respectively. These results show that analog GKP information continues to improve decoding under circuit-level noise. Under the common simulation assumptions used here, the selected BB sequence also yields a higher finite-size crossing estimate than the selected tricycle sequence.
Abstract:Scalable fault-tolerant quantum error correction based on Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) codes requires finite-rate outer codes that can exploit analog GKP information under realistic circuit noise. However, quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) outer codes have not been systematically compared as candidates for circuit-level GKP concatenation. Here, we benchmark BB and tricycle codes using a unified simulation framework that progresses from code-capacity noise to repeated noisy syndrome extraction and schedule-resolved displacement propagation. Across all three noise models, analog-informed belief-propagation with ordered-statistics decoding (BP-OSD) yields higher finite-size crossing estimates than hard-decision decoding. In the full circuit model, the analog-informed crossings are \(\sigma_{\mathrm{th}}\simeq0.212\) for the selected BB sequence and \(0.142\) for the tricycle sequence, corresponding to squeezing requirements of approximately \(10.46\,\mathrm{dB}\) and \(13.94\,\mathrm{dB}\), respectively. These results show that analog GKP information continues to improve decoding under circuit-level noise. Under the common simulation assumptions used here, the selected BB sequence also yields a higher finite-size crossing estimate than the selected tricycle sequence.
arXiv:2609.35282 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.35282v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35282 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words
Related coverage

What is Quantum Error Correction? Complete 2026 Beginner’s Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 29, 2026

Top Quantum Error Correction Companies 2026: Complete Vendor Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 30, 2026

Inside D-Wave’s Dual-Rail Qubit Roadmap and the New Haven Bet on Logical Qubits
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 11, 2026

IonQ Shows Quantum Error Correction Can Finally Do Its Job
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 5, 2026