Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This empirical study addresses the critical challenge of adapting Automatic Speech Recognition models for children without degrading performance on adult speech, a key issue in inclusive AI deployment. The research evaluates various fine-tuning strategies across Arabic and English datasets, demonstrating that weight-space merging techniques like LERP and TIES effectively balance child adaptation gains with adult retention. For practitioners building accessible voice interfaces, the findings highlight bilingual adaptation as a more stable approach than language-specific tuning when managing this specific trade-off.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Child ASR Adaptation with Adult Retention: An Empirical Study

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.08827v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems often underperform for children and non-native speakers, while adapting adult ASR models to child speech can cause adult-speech forgetting. We study child ASR adaptation with adult retention across Arabic and English. We compare full fine-tuning, LoRA, and post-hoc weight-space merging across encoder--decoder, encoder--CTC, and AudioLLM-based ASR systems. Experiments use Arabic native and non-native child speech, English MyST child speech, and adult benchmarks from MGB-2 and LibriSpeech test-clean. We evaluate recognition quality with WER and quantify the adaptation--retention trade-off using Retention Index, Child Adaptation Gain, and Adaptation Recovery. Results show that child adaptation is necessary, especially for non-native Arabic and English child speech, but direct adaptation often reduces adult ASR performance. Bilingual adaptation is more stable than language-specific adaptation. Weight-space merging often improves the trade-off, especially for encoder--CTC, Whisper, and AudioLLM-based ASR, with LERP favoring adult retention and TIES recovering stronger child gains. For the encoder--decoder model, direct bilingual fine-tuning remains strongest in raw WER.\footnote{Code, and models are available at https://github.com/qcri/Child-ASR-Adaptation.

Abstract:Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems often underperform for children and non-native speakers, while adapting adult ASR models to child speech can cause adult-speech forgetting. We study child ASR adaptation with adult retention across Arabic and English. We compare full fine-tuning, LoRA, and post-hoc weight-space merging across encoder--decoder, encoder--CTC, and AudioLLM-based ASR systems. Experiments use Arabic native and non-native child speech, English MyST child speech, and adult benchmarks from MGB-2 and LibriSpeech test-clean. We evaluate recognition quality with WER and quantify the adaptation--retention trade-off using Retention Index, Child Adaptation Gain, and Adaptation Recovery. Results show that child adaptation is necessary, especially for non-native Arabic and English child speech, but direct adaptation often reduces adult ASR performance. Bilingual adaptation is more stable than language-specific adaptation. Weight-space merging often improves the trade-off, especially for encoder--CTC, Whisper, and AudioLLM-based ASR, with LERP favoring adult retention and TIES recovering stronger child gains. For the encoder--decoder model, direct bilingual fine-tuning remains strongest in raw WER.\footnote{Code, and models are available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)

arXiv:2610.08827 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.08827v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08827 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 273 words

Related coverage