aiqbench analysis
ChartDensity-Bench addresses a critical gap in evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) by specifically testing their ability to reconstruct numerical data from visually dense scientific charts. The study reveals that reconstruction accuracy degrades as the number of simultaneous charts increases, highlighting visual density as a previously underexplored factor affecting model robustness. This benchmark provides essential metrics for assessing structural reliability and numerical fidelity in complex, high-density visual contexts.
ChartDensity-Bench: Benchmarking MLLMs for Numerical Data Reconstruction under Visual Density
arXiv:2609.38781v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer a promising approach for recovering numerical data from scientific charts, but their ability to reconstruct chart data from visually dense figures remains poorly understood. Existing chart understanding benchmarks primarily evaluate question answering or chart-level reasoning and provide limited support for evaluating structured numerical reconstruction from scientific figures. We introduce \textbf{ChartDensity-Bench}, a benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on structured numerical data reconstruction from compound chart figures under controlled visual density. Built from charts paired with source-level ground-truth data, ChartDensity-Bench systematically varies the number of simultaneously presented charts ($k\in{1,3,6,9}$), enabling controlled evaluation of density-induced degradation. We further propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework covering structural reliability, reconstruction completeness, parseability, and numerical fidelity. Experiments on five recent MLLMs show that numerical reconstruction generally degrades as visual density increases, while the magnitude of degradation varies substantially across models. Chart-level paired comparisons further show that the same source chart can incur higher reconstruction error when embedded in denser visual contexts. These findings highlight visual density as an important and previously underexplored factor in MLLM chart data reconstruction and provide a systematic benchmark for evaluating model robustness in this setting.
Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer a promising approach for recovering numerical data from scientific charts, but their ability to reconstruct chart data from visually dense figures remains poorly understood. Existing chart understanding benchmarks primarily evaluate question answering or chart-level reasoning and provide limited support for evaluating structured numerical reconstruction from scientific figures. We introduce \textbf{ChartDensity-Bench}, a benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on structured numerical data reconstruction from compound chart figures under controlled visual density. Built from charts paired with source-level ground-truth data, ChartDensity-Bench systematically varies the number of simultaneously presented charts ($k\in{1,3,6,9}$), enabling controlled evaluation of density-induced degradation. We further propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework covering structural reliability, reconstruction completeness, parseability, and numerical fidelity. Experiments on five recent MLLMs show that numerical reconstruction generally degrades as visual density increases, while the magnitude of degradation varies substantially across models. Chart-level paired comparisons further show that the same source chart can incur higher reconstruction error when embedded in denser visual contexts. These findings highlight visual density as an important and previously underexplored factor in MLLM chart data reconstruction and provide a systematic benchmark for evaluating model robustness in this setting.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.38781 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.38781v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38781 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words
Related coverage
Code as Representation: A Compilable Parsing Paradigm for Academic Documents
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026
CapGeo-Bench: Decoupling Visual Perception from Reasoning and Evaluating Geometric Understanding
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026

Introducing Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026
TaoD2C-Bench: Benchmarking MLLMs for Industrial UI Code Generation Beyond Visual Fidelity
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026