aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the extent to which textual information drives pixel-level predictions in multimodal medical image segmentation, revealing significant dataset-dependent variations in text reliance. By introducing an Evidence Decoupling Decoder, the study demonstrates that text primarily influences global semantic modulation rather than independent spatial localization, offering critical insights for optimizing fusion strategies in VLMs.
Characterizing Text Branch Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Segmentation via Evidence Decoupling
arXiv:2609.02663v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising performance in medical image segmentation by incorporating clinical text. However, it remains unclear how much textual information actually contributes to pixel-level predictions. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of text in multimodal medical image segmentation. We first analyze several commonly used fusion strategies and find that segmentation performance is largely insensitive to the choice of fusion module. To further understand modality interactions, we propose an Evidence Decoupling Decoder (EDD) based on evidential deep learning and deep supervision. EDD serves as an internal representation analysis tool that decomposes image evidence and text-modulated evidence throughout the decoding process while maintaining competitive segmentation performance. Experimental results show that the sensitivity to text perturbation varies substantially across datasets. On BUSI and BTMRI, removing text causes catastrophic performance drops, indicating strong model reliance on textual input. On ISIC and Kvasir-SEG, text exerts relatively marginal influence. We further find that text affects predictions mainly through global semantic modulation rather than independent spatial localization, and that the specific semantic components driving text sensitivity differ across datasets. These findings provide a deeper understanding of modality interaction in multimodal medical image segmentation and offer practical insights for future model design.
Abstract:Pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising performance in medical image segmentation by incorporating clinical text. However, it remains unclear how much textual information actually contributes to pixel-level predictions. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of text in multimodal medical image segmentation. We first analyze several commonly used fusion strategies and find that segmentation performance is largely insensitive to the choice of fusion module. To further understand modality interactions, we propose an Evidence Decoupling Decoder (EDD) based on evidential deep learning and deep supervision. EDD serves as an internal representation analysis tool that decomposes image evidence and text-modulated evidence throughout the decoding process while maintaining competitive segmentation performance. Experimental results show that the sensitivity to text perturbation varies substantially across datasets. On BUSI and BTMRI, removing text causes catastrophic performance drops, indicating strong model reliance on textual input. On ISIC and Kvasir-SEG, text exerts relatively marginal influence. We further find that text affects predictions mainly through global semantic modulation rather than independent spatial localization, and that the specific semantic components driving text sensitivity differ across datasets. These findings provide a deeper understanding of modality interaction in multimodal medical image segmentation and offer practical insights for future model design.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.02663 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.02663v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02663 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 298 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
Beyond Static Anchors: Bounded Prototype Conditioning for Language-Free Medical Anomaly Detection
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026