aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a statistical framework for verifying probabilistic AI models like LLMs through third-party challenge-response identity verification (TP-CRIV). By quantifying how stochastic outputs affect detection performance, the study provides concrete estimates for the verification budgets needed to reliably distinguish between matching and non-matching provers. These findings offer a rigorous theoretical basis for securing remote model access without requiring direct reference to the underlying weights.
Characterizing Statistical Separability in TP-CRIV for Probabilistic AI Models
arXiv:2610.11163v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Third-party challenge-response identity verification (TP-CRIV) enables an independent verifier to assess whether a claimant possesses a model identical to a remotely deployed model without directly accessing the reference model. However, for probabilistic AI models, repeated executions of the same query may produce different outputs and therefore different verification observations. This raises the question of how such stochastic evidence should be accumulated and how much evidence is required for reliable verification. In this work, we characterize statistical separability in TP-CRIV of probabilistic AI models. Specifically, we relate challenge-wise behavior of matching and non-matching provers to verification-level separability. The characterization explicitly describes how the numbers of independent challenges and repeated responses affect detection performance and enables the verification budget required for a target AUC to be estimated. We instantiate the proposed characterization for LLMs using open-ended challenges. The experiments demonstrate matching-non-matching separation, close agreement between theoretical and empirical AUCs, and consistent estimates of the minimum verification budgets. These results provide a statistical basis for relating probabilistic model behavior to verification-level separability and the evidence required for third-party verification.
Abstract:Third-party challenge-response identity verification (TP-CRIV) enables an independent verifier to assess whether a claimant possesses a model identical to a remotely deployed model without directly accessing the reference model. However, for probabilistic AI models, repeated executions of the same query may produce different outputs and therefore different verification observations. This raises the question of how such stochastic evidence should be accumulated and how much evidence is required for reliable verification. In this work, we characterize statistical separability in TP-CRIV of probabilistic AI models. Specifically, we relate challenge-wise behavior of matching and non-matching provers to verification-level separability. The characterization explicitly describes how the numbers of independent challenges and repeated responses affect detection performance and enables the verification budget required for a target AUC to be estimated. We instantiate the proposed characterization for LLMs using open-ended challenges. The experiments demonstrate matching-non-matching separation, close agreement between theoretical and empirical AUCs, and consistent estimates of the minimum verification budgets. These results provide a statistical basis for relating probabilistic model behavior to verification-level separability and the evidence required for third-party verification.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.11163 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2610.11163v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11163 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026

Non-Gaussian Noise Magnetometry Using Local Spin Qubits
Quantum Journal · Aug 27, 2026

Quantifiers and witnesses for the nonclassicality of measurements and of states
Quantum Journal · Jul 30, 2026