aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a learning-based framework using Gaussian Process Regression to quantify physical error contributions in superconducting quantum gates, providing crucial uncertainty estimates that validate or challenge existing noise models. The study demonstrates on a transmon array that even advanced first-principles models fail to fully capture the complex error dynamics of two-qubit gates, highlighting the necessity for uncertainty-aware error budgeting in scaling up quantum hardware.
Characterizing Physical Error Contributions of Quantum Gates
arXiv:2305.08916v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large-scale quantum computation requires a reliable assessment of the main sources of error in the implemented quantum gates. To this aim, we provide a learning-based framework that extracts the contribution of each physical error source to the infidelity of a series of gates, together with an uncertainty estimate for every contribution. Crucially, the uncertainties provided by the underlying Gaussian Process Regression serve as a diagnostic of the assumed noise model itself: if the physical model does not fully explain the experimental observations, the framework signals this instead of returning a falsely precise error budget. We demonstrate the proposed budget learning procedure on a pair of qubits in a transmon array architecture, where we compute the error budgets of the native single- and two-qubit gates. For this purpose, we have also developed an advanced noise model based on the first-principles understanding of the error processes in current superconducting processors, including complex (e.g. non-Markovian) error sources. While the single-qubit budgets are reconstructed with high confidence, the same diagnostic reveals that even this detailed noise model does not fully capture the error dynamics of a state-of-the-art two-qubit gate --- quantitative evidence that uncertainty-aware error budgeting is necessary for the characterization of current quantum hardware.
Abstract:Large-scale quantum computation requires a reliable assessment of the main sources of error in the implemented quantum gates. To this aim, we provide a learning-based framework that extracts the contribution of each physical error source to the infidelity of a series of gates, together with an uncertainty estimate for every contribution. Crucially, the uncertainties provided by the underlying Gaussian Process Regression serve as a diagnostic of the assumed noise model itself: if the physical model does not fully explain the experimental observations, the framework signals this instead of returning a falsely precise error budget. We demonstrate the proposed budget learning procedure on a pair of qubits in a transmon array architecture, where we compute the error budgets of the native single- and two-qubit gates. For this purpose, we have also developed an advanced noise model based on the first-principles understanding of the error processes in current superconducting processors, including complex (e.g. non-Markovian) error sources. While the single-qubit budgets are reconstructed with high confidence, the same diagnostic reveals that even this detailed noise model does not fully capture the error dynamics of a state-of-the-art two-qubit gate --- quantitative evidence that uncertainty-aware error budgeting is necessary for the characterization of current quantum hardware.
arXiv:2305.08916 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2305.08916v3 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.08916 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 290 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

RAQM: Eight qubits stored in a single superconducting memory module
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 8, 2026

New method automatically finds errors in quantum states
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 7, 2026

New benchmark, QuSquare, tests near-term quantum devices
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 12, 2026