aiqbench analysis
This study provides critical empirical data on the degradation mechanisms of Josephson junctions, identifying storage atmosphere and fabrication history as key determinants of aging rates in superconducting qubits. The findings establish a lower bound for resistance tuning via thermal annealing, offering essential guidance for improving the long-term stability and yield of large-scale quantum processors.
Characterization of Josephson Junction Aging and Annealing Under Different Environments
arXiv:2602.23888v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Understanding the aging behavior of Josephson junctions and the effect of annealing on junction resistances is important in building large-scale superconducting quantum processors. Here we study the effects of aging of Al/AlOx/Al Josephson junctions under different storage conditions from immediately after fabrication up to 2 to 3 months. We find that the aging curve follows a logarithmic curve, with the aging amplitude mainly determined by fabrication conditions and the aging rate determined by both fabrication and storage conditions. Junctions stored at ambient laboratory conditions aged faster compared to junctions stored in a nitrogen atmosphere or vacuum, with the aging speed appreciably changes when the storage condition changed. We also compared the effect of thermal annealing under nitrogen environment with annealing under ambient conditions up to 250$^\circ$C. We find that under nitrogen environment, the resistances decreased at all temperatures tested, while under ambient environment the resistances increased at 200$^\circ$C and decreased at 250$^\circ$C instead. We were unable to decrease the resistance below the initial-time resistance, suggesting a lower limit on the range of resistance tuning.
Abstract:Understanding the aging behavior of Josephson junctions and the effect of annealing on junction resistances is important in building large-scale superconducting quantum processors. Here we study the effects of aging of Al/AlOx/Al Josephson junctions under different storage conditions from immediately after fabrication up to 2 to 3 months. We find that the aging curve follows a logarithmic curve, with the aging amplitude mainly determined by fabrication conditions and the aging rate determined by both fabrication and storage conditions. Junctions stored at ambient laboratory conditions aged faster compared to junctions stored in a nitrogen atmosphere or vacuum, with the aging speed appreciably changes when the storage condition changed. We also compared the effect of thermal annealing under nitrogen environment with annealing under ambient conditions up to 250$^\circ$C. We find that under nitrogen environment, the resistances decreased at all temperatures tested, while under ambient environment the resistances increased at 200$^\circ$C and decreased at 250$^\circ$C instead. We were unable to decrease the resistance below the initial-time resistance, suggesting a lower limit on the range of resistance tuning.
10 pages, 4 figures. Accepted to Superconductor Science and Technology
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con)
arXiv:2602.23888 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2602.23888v3 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.23888 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words
Related coverage

Quantum in the Palm of Your Hand : The Evolution of Superconducting Qubits
newswise.com · Jul 28, 2026

Qubit errors traced to two sources, cosmic rays, cooler vibrations
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 12, 2026

New method maps complex circuit noise into quantum Hamiltonian models
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 28, 2026

Non-Gaussian Noise Magnetometry Using Local Spin Qubits
Quantum Journal · Aug 27, 2026