aiqbench analysis
ChaosProbe introduces a deterministic neurochaos-inspired method for generating fixed-length fingerprints of frozen transformer input-embedding spaces without requiring contextual computation or task adaptation. By analyzing chaotic trajectory responses like firing rate and entropy, the technique successfully distinguishes between major model families (e.g., GPT vs. BERT) using neutral prompts in this initial proof-of-concept study. This approach offers a novel lens for examining intrinsic structural properties of pre-trained models prior to downstream fine-tuning or inference tasks.
ChaosProbe: A Neurochaotic Lens on Frozen Transformer Input-Embedding Spaces
arXiv:2608.01968v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformer models are most often understood through what they do: their benchmark performance, generation quality, or behavior on downstream tasks. Yet frozen transformer input-embedding spaces may also be examined through their responses to a controlled deterministic probe before contextual computation or task-specific adaptation. Guided by this response-based view, we introduce \emph{ChaosProbe}, a deterministic neurochaos-inspired method for constructing response-based fingerprints of frozen transformer input-embedding spaces. For each prompt-level embedding matrix, ChaosProbe applies a chaotic trajectory-based transformation and summarizes its Firing Rate and Entropy channel responses with complementary representation-level measures, producing a fixed-length signature for each model. In a bounded proof-of-concept study of $80$ neutral prompts and four pretrained models---GPT-2, DistilGPT2, BERT-base-uncased, and RoBERTa-base---Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, and cosine similarity each recover all four same-family nearest-neighbor assignments and both expected mutual family pairs. Euclidean distance recovers three of the four assignments and one of the two mutual family pairs. Paired bootstrap resampling supports the stability of the Pearson and Spearman pairings over the observed prompt set, and signature-validity checks show that constant or collapsed responses do not dominate the reported fingerprints. These results provide a cohort-dependent proof of concept that deterministic neurochaotic response signatures can expose broad structure among frozen transformer input-embedding spaces.
Abstract:Transformer models are most often understood through what they do: their benchmark performance, generation quality, or behavior on downstream tasks. Yet frozen transformer input-embedding spaces may also be examined through their responses to a controlled deterministic probe before contextual computation or task-specific adaptation. Guided by this response-based view, we introduce \emph{ChaosProbe}, a deterministic neurochaos-inspired method for constructing response-based fingerprints of frozen transformer input-embedding spaces. For each prompt-level embedding matrix, ChaosProbe applies a chaotic trajectory-based transformation and summarizes its Firing Rate and Entropy channel responses with complementary representation-level measures, producing a fixed-length signature for each model. In a bounded proof-of-concept study of $80$ neutral prompts and four pretrained models---GPT-2, DistilGPT2, BERT-base-uncased, and RoBERTa-base---Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, and cosine similarity each recover all four same-family nearest-neighbor assignments and both expected mutual family pairs. Euclidean distance recovers three of the four assignments and one of the two mutual family pairs. Paired bootstrap resampling supports the stability of the Pearson and Spearman pairings over the observed prompt set, and signature-validity checks show that constant or collapsed responses do not dominate the reported fingerprints. These results provide a cohort-dependent proof of concept that deterministic neurochaotic response signatures can expose broad structure among frozen transformer input-embedding spaces.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
arXiv:2608.01968 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.01968v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01968 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 300 words
Related coverage
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026