aiqbench analysis
Chameleon introduces a control-indexed prospective memory architecture that effectively bridges observation-action delays in robotic manipulation, achieving state-of-the-art performance on long-horizon benchmarks like LIBERO-10 and MemoryBench. By explicitly training policies to maintain separable histories and retrieve control-relevant traces, the model significantly outperforms existing baselines on a new real-robot benchmark designed to isolate visual ambiguity. This advancement marks a critical step toward robust embodied AI capable of handling complex temporal dependencies in dynamic environments.
Chameleon: Control-Indexed Prospective Memory for Visuomotor Manipulation
arXiv:2603.24576v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Robots often observe information that determines a future action long before that action is executed. In a shell game, for example, a robot first sees which cup hides the ball, watches the cups move, and only later needs to choose the correct cup. The final observation alone is not enough for a decision: the correct action depends on an earlier event. We refer to this temporal gap as observation-action delay. It makes memory a policy-facing problem: a policy must keep similar histories distinct, retrieve the past event relevant to the current decision, and convert that recall into an action-ready state. We call these requirements separability, addressability, and prospectiveness. We introduce Chameleon, a ~60M visuomotor policy for control-indexed prospective memory. Chameleon writes embodied event memory, preserves separable histories, retrieves control-relevant traces, and trains the resulting working state to be prospective. We also introduce Camo-Dataset, a real-robot benchmark that isolates observation-action delay by making the decision scene visually ambiguous, so the correct action must be inferred from earlier observations. Chameleon improves decision/end-to-end success on Camo-Dataset from 22.5%/21.3% to 80.8%/71.3%. On public long-horizon memory benchmarks, it achieves 87.1% +/- 0.8% on LIBERO-10, 97.3% +/- 4.5% on MemoryBench, and 75.1% +/- 1.4% on MIKASA-Robo, setting the state of the art for same-size models and exceeding multiple larger VLA baselines under the reported protocols. Probes and ablations show that Chameleon learns separable, addressable, and prospective memory, and that these properties drive its performance gains.
Abstract:Robots often observe information that determines a future action long before that action is executed. In a shell game, for example, a robot first sees which cup hides the ball, watches the cups move, and only later needs to choose the correct cup. The final observation alone is not enough for a decision: the correct action depends on an earlier event. We refer to this temporal gap as observation-action delay. It makes memory a policy-facing problem: a policy must keep similar histories distinct, retrieve the past event relevant to the current decision, and convert that recall into an action-ready state. We call these requirements separability, addressability, and prospectiveness. We introduce Chameleon, a ~60M visuomotor policy for control-indexed prospective memory. Chameleon writes embodied event memory, preserves separable histories, retrieves control-relevant traces, and trains the resulting working state to be prospective. We also introduce Camo-Dataset, a real-robot benchmark that isolates observation-action delay by making the decision scene visually ambiguous, so the correct action must be inferred from earlier observations. Chameleon improves decision/end-to-end success on Camo-Dataset from 22.5%/21.3% to 80.8%/71.3%. On public long-horizon memory benchmarks, it achieves 87.1% +/- 0.8% on LIBERO-10, 97.3% +/- 4.5% on MemoryBench, and 75.1% +/- 1.4% on MIKASA-Robo, setting the state of the art for same-size models and exceeding multiple larger VLA baselines under the reported protocols. Probes and ablations show that Chameleon learns separable, addressable, and prospective memory, and that these properties drive its performance gains.
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2603.24576 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2603.24576v2 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.24576 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 339 words
Related coverage
TRACE: Trajectory-Routed Causal Memory for Delayed-Evidence Visuomotor Imitation
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026
TRACE: Trajectory-Routed Causal Memory for Delayed-Evidence Visuomotor Imitation
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026
TRACE: Trajectory-Routed Causal Memory for Delayed-Evidence Visuomotor Imitation
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026
Goal2Skill: Long-Horizon Manipulation with Adaptive Planning and Reflection
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026