aiqbench analysis
ChainUQ addresses a critical gap in large language model reliability by quantifying uncertainty based on logical consistency within reasoning chains rather than relying solely on token-level probabilities. This framework effectively calibrates confidence scores to detect conflicts between intermediate claims and final conclusions, offering significant improvements in error calibration without requiring additional fine-tuning.
ChainUQ: Reasoning Consistency-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models
arXiv:2609.26060v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive reasoning capabilities, response-level confidence may remain unreliable when intermediate claims conflict with the final conclusion. Therefore, effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) is required to capture logical inconsistencies within the reasoning chain, not just the correctness of the final output. Current approaches have two major limitations: (1) their reliance on token-level probabilities fails to capture reasoning consistency, and (2) they lack mechanisms to dynamically calibrate confidence using the structural logic of the generated chain. To advance existing research, we introduce ChainUQ, a reasoning consistency-aware uncertainty quantification framework for LLMs. ChainUQ consists of two key technical components: an alignment-aware lightweight UQ module that estimates a raw intrinsic model confidence score from frozen features aligned to the final conclusion, and a reasoning consistency-aware calibrator that refines this score using reasoning-chain consistency evidence. Evaluations across diverse in-distribution and out-of-distribution benchmarks show that ChainUQ consistently improves response-level uncertainty estimation, achieving an average 3.1% relative gain in AUROC and up to 45.0% relative reduction in ECE, and can be directly transferred to new settings without additional fine-tuning.
Abstract:While large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive reasoning capabilities, response-level confidence may remain unreliable when intermediate claims conflict with the final conclusion. Therefore, effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) is required to capture logical inconsistencies within the reasoning chain, not just the correctness of the final output. Current approaches have two major limitations: (1) their reliance on token-level probabilities fails to capture reasoning consistency, and (2) they lack mechanisms to dynamically calibrate confidence using the structural logic of the generated chain. To advance existing research, we introduce ChainUQ, a reasoning consistency-aware uncertainty quantification framework for LLMs. ChainUQ consists of two key technical components: an alignment-aware lightweight UQ module that estimates a raw intrinsic model confidence score from frozen features aligned to the final conclusion, and a reasoning consistency-aware calibrator that refines this score using reasoning-chain consistency evidence. Evaluations across diverse in-distribution and out-of-distribution benchmarks show that ChainUQ consistently improves response-level uncertainty estimation, achieving an average 3.1% relative gain in AUROC and up to 45.0% relative reduction in ECE, and can be directly transferred to new settings without additional fine-tuning.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.26060 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.26060v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26060 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 271 words
Related coverage
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026
AutoXRD: Autonomous LLM Agents and Comprehensive Evaluation for Powder Diffraction Analysis
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026