Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

CHAIN addresses systematic calibration bias in large language models by decomposing probabilistic prediction into causal-temporal stages, offering a structural approach to improving reliability under uncertainty. The method modulates temporal decay and aggregates independent causal chains to outperform existing benchmarks across diverse domains. This research advances the field of trustworthy AI forecasting by integrating causal reasoning directly into the model's inference pipeline.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CHAIN: Calibrated LLM Forecasting via Causal-Temporal Hypergraph Inference

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.36689v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models have achieved significant progress in event forecasting, yet their probability outputs exhibit systematic calibration bias that varies heterogeneously across different domains and question types, undermining the trustworthiness of probabilistic outputs for decision-making under uncertainty. However, existing calibration methods typically correct probability outputs after prediction is complete, without modeling the structural sources of bias within the prediction process itself. To address this challenge, we decompose probabilistic prediction over causal-temporal hypergraphs into three stages, evidence weighting, evidence aggregation, and source fusion, and propose CHAIN, which designs stage-specific mechanisms to mitigate bias at each stage: (i) modulating the temporal decay function by causal topological distance, (ii) aggregating approximately independent causal chains via Noisy-OR after direction-aware deduplication, and (iii) driving adaptive fusion by causal coverage and directional balance. Experimental results on cross-domain forecasting benchmarks show CHAIN outperforms existing methods in expected calibration error, Brier score, and accuracy. Our project is available at https://github.com/QwenQKing/Chain.

Abstract:Large language models have achieved significant progress in event forecasting, yet their probability outputs exhibit systematic calibration bias that varies heterogeneously across different domains and question types, undermining the trustworthiness of probabilistic outputs for decision-making under uncertainty. However, existing calibration methods typically correct probability outputs after prediction is complete, without modeling the structural sources of bias within the prediction process itself. To address this challenge, we decompose probabilistic prediction over causal-temporal hypergraphs into three stages, evidence weighting, evidence aggregation, and source fusion, and propose CHAIN, which designs stage-specific mechanisms to mitigate bias at each stage: (i) modulating the temporal decay function by causal topological distance, (ii) aggregating approximately independent causal chains via Noisy-OR after direction-aware deduplication, and (iii) driving adaptive fusion by causal coverage and directional balance. Experimental results on cross-domain forecasting benchmarks show CHAIN outperforms existing methods in expected calibration error, Brier score, and accuracy. Our project is available at this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.36689 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.36689v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36689 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words

Related coverage