Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces an efficient hypothesis testing framework for certifying quantum behavior in macroscopic systems, such as levitated nanoparticles. By leveraging likelihood ratio tests across entire probability distributions rather than just interference visibility, the method achieves exponential reductions in required measurements to distinguish between classical and quantum mechanics under decoherence. This advancement provides a more practical pathway for falsifying classical physics at large scales without imposing overly stringent experimental constraints.
Source coveringarXiv

Certifying Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics via Hypothesis Testing with Finite Data

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2506.22092v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We address the challenge of certifying quantum behavior with single macroscopic massive particles, subject to decoherence and finite data. We propose a hypothesis testing framework that distinguishes between classical and quantum mechanics based on position measurements. While interference pattern visibility in single-particle quantum superposition experiments has been commonly used as a sufficient criterion to falsify classical mechanics, we show that, from a hypothesis testing perspective, it is neither necessary nor efficient. Focusing on recent proposals to prepare macroscopic superposition states of levitated nanoparticles, we show that the likelihood ratio test -- which leverages differences across the entire probability distribution -- provides an exponential reduction in measurements needed to reach a given confidence level. These results generalize to a broad class of quantum states, and offer a principled, efficient method to falsify classical mechanics in interference experiments, relaxing the experimental constraints faced by current efforts to test quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale.

Abstract:We address the challenge of certifying quantum behavior with single macroscopic massive particles, subject to decoherence and finite data. We propose a hypothesis testing framework that distinguishes between classical and quantum mechanics based on position measurements. While interference pattern visibility in single-particle quantum superposition experiments has been commonly used as a sufficient criterion to falsify classical mechanics, we show that, from a hypothesis testing perspective, it is neither necessary nor efficient. Focusing on recent proposals to prepare macroscopic superposition states of levitated nanoparticles, we show that the likelihood ratio test -- which leverages differences across the entire probability distribution -- provides an exponential reduction in measurements needed to reach a given confidence level. These results generalize to a broad class of quantum states, and offer a principled, efficient method to falsify classical mechanics in interference experiments, relaxing the experimental constraints faced by current efforts to test quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale.

arXiv:2506.22092 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2506.22092v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.22092 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023196 (2026)

https://doi.org/10.1103/gttg-mvrq Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 257 words

Related coverage