aiqbench analysis
Central Dogma Transformer II demonstrates that architectural constraints mirroring biological processes can yield interpretable models capable of recovering specific gene regulatory networks and predicting perturbation effects without clinical data. By mapping attention mechanisms directly to DNA, RNA, and protein interactions, this research advances the field of AI for science by turning black-box predictors into inspectable tools for understanding cellular mechanisms.
Central Dogma Transformer II: An AI Microscope for Understanding Cellular Regulatory Mechanisms
arXiv:2602.08751v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Motivation: Interpretability is not optional in biology: understanding gene regulation requires models whose learned structure can be directly interrogated, not merely accurate predictors whose internals resist mapping onto regulatory relationships. We ask whether an architecture mirroring the central dogma yields attention and gradient maps that recover known regulatory elements and networks in inspectable form. Results: Central Dogma Transformer II (CDT-II) mirrors the central dogma in its architecture -- DNA self-attention, RNA self-attention, and DNA-to-RNA cross-attention -- requiring only genomic embeddings and raw per-cell expression. On K562 CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) data with five genes held out entirely, CDT-II predicts perturbation effects (per-gene mean r = 0.84), recovers the GFI1B regulatory network (6.6-fold enrichment, P = 3.5 x 10^-17), and concentrates cross-attention on ENCODE regulatory elements including CTCF sites (mean 7.67x across 28 target genes, P < 0.001). Gradient attribution predicts consequences of perturbing therapeutic targets (mean r = 0.82). For TFRC, target of the anti-TfR1 antibody PPMX-T003, it identifies erythrocyte-structure, iron-dependent DNA-synthesis and oxidative-stress genes, matching anemia and ferroptosis reported clinically and preclinically -- without clinical data as input. CDT-II acts as an AI microscope, surfacing clinically relevant regulatory structure from perturbation experiments alone. Availability: Source code is available at https://github.com/nobusama/CDT2. Pre-computed embeddings, training data, and model weights are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/nobusama17/CDT2-data.
Abstract:Motivation: Interpretability is not optional in biology: understanding gene regulation requires models whose learned structure can be directly interrogated, not merely accurate predictors whose internals resist mapping onto regulatory relationships. We ask whether an architecture mirroring the central dogma yields attention and gradient maps that recover known regulatory elements and networks in inspectable form. Results: Central Dogma Transformer II (CDT-II) mirrors the central dogma in its architecture -- DNA self-attention, RNA self-attention, and DNA-to-RNA cross-attention -- requiring only genomic embeddings and raw per-cell expression. On K562 CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) data with five genes held out entirely, CDT-II predicts perturbation effects (per-gene mean r = 0.84), recovers the GFI1B regulatory network (6.6-fold enrichment, P = 3.5 x 10^-17), and concentrates cross-attention on ENCODE regulatory elements including CTCF sites (mean 7.67x across 28 target genes, P < 0.001). Gradient attribution predicts consequences of perturbing therapeutic targets (mean r = 0.82). For TFRC, target of the anti-TfR1 antibody PPMX-T003, it identifies erythrocyte-structure, iron-dependent DNA-synthesis and oxidative-stress genes, matching anemia and ferroptosis reported clinically and preclinically -- without clinical data as input. CDT-II acts as an AI microscope, surfacing clinically relevant regulatory structure from perturbation experiments alone. Availability: Source code is available at this https URL. Pre-computed embeddings, training data, and model weights are available at this https URL.
28 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables, 42 references. v4: accepted for publication in Bioinformatics Advances; text, figures and references updated to match the accepted version
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
arXiv:2602.08751 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2602.08751v4 [cs.LG] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
Our response to Séb Krier on Plan A
LessWrong · Jul 14, 2026
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026