Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

CellRFT addresses a critical gap in single-cell modeling by replacing surrogate loss functions with direct reinforcement learning feedback from biological evaluations. This approach allows models to optimize specific therapeutic or gene-function criteria that previously could not be directly trained, offering new insights into how reward structures shape predictive behavior. The framework's ability to integrate multiple hierarchical rewards provides a robust method for improving perturbation predictions across various pretrained architectures.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CellRFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Single-Cell Perturbation Modeling

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.19970v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting cellular responses to perturbations supports the study of gene function, disease mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies. Despite advances in single-cell perturbation modeling, existing models typically optimize surrogate losses that do not directly reflect the biological criteria used for evaluation, so better data fitting need not yield better biological predictions. To address this mismatch, we introduce \textbf{CellRFT}, a reinforcement fine-tuning framework that uses biological evaluation as direct training feedback. CellRFT uses policy-gradient optimization to learn from non-differentiable evaluations of generated cell populations and integrates multiple biological rewards through hierarchical reward aggregation. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate CellRFT's applicability across different pretrained models and effectiveness in improving perturbation prediction, reveal that optimizing one biological criterion can help or hinder others, and show that complementary rewards can improve criteria beyond those directly optimized, offering a way to probe how biological metrics shape model behavior, with the potential to inform evaluation design. Code will be made available.

Abstract:Predicting cellular responses to perturbations supports the study of gene function, disease mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies. Despite advances in single-cell perturbation modeling, existing models typically optimize surrogate losses that do not directly reflect the biological criteria used for evaluation, so better data fitting need not yield better biological predictions. To address this mismatch, we introduce \textbf{CellRFT}, a reinforcement fine-tuning framework that uses biological evaluation as direct training feedback. CellRFT uses policy-gradient optimization to learn from non-differentiable evaluations of generated cell populations and integrates multiple biological rewards through hierarchical reward aggregation. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate CellRFT's applicability across different pretrained models and effectiveness in improving perturbation prediction, reveal that optimizing one biological criterion can help or hinder others, and show that complementary rewards can improve criteria beyond those directly optimized, offering a way to probe how biological metrics shape model behavior, with the potential to inform evaluation design. Code will be made available.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.19970 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.19970v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19970 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words

Related coverage