aiqbench analysis
This research utilizes mechanistic interpretability to demonstrate that multilingual language models share consistent internal mechanisms for processing syntactic structures across typologically similar languages. By isolating and transferring these specific computational units, the study offers empirical validation for linguistic theories regarding cross-linguistic regularities within AI systems.
Causal Interventions Reveal Typologically Organized Syntactic Mechanisms in Multilingual Language Models
arXiv:2608.28924v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linguistic theory has long recognized cross-linguistic syntactic regularities, leading to claims that these similar structures are processed by similar mechanisms. However, this hypothesis has been difficult to test empirically due to our lack of fine-grained, manipulable access of human processing mechanisms. In this work, we take advantage of techniques from mechanistic interpretability to study such a question in multilingual LMs. We first isolate language-internal mechanisms before attempting to transfer them cross-lingually. Across four models and three well-studied constructions (subject--verb number agreement, anaphoric pronoun gender agreement, and filler--gap object extraction) we find consistent cross-lingual mechanism transfer. We further find transfer to be graded, with more transfer between more typologically similar languages. We believe our work provides novel hypotheses about cross-linguistic syntactic structures and multilingual processing, and more broadly shows how the study of language models can help inform linguistic theory.
Abstract:Linguistic theory has long recognized cross-linguistic syntactic regularities, leading to claims that these similar structures are processed by similar mechanisms. However, this hypothesis has been difficult to test empirically due to our lack of fine-grained, manipulable access of human processing mechanisms. In this work, we take advantage of techniques from mechanistic interpretability to study such a question in multilingual LMs. We first isolate language-internal mechanisms before attempting to transfer them cross-lingually. Across four models and three well-studied constructions (subject--verb number agreement, anaphoric pronoun gender agreement, and filler--gap object extraction) we find consistent cross-lingual mechanism transfer. We further find transfer to be graded, with more transfer between more typologically similar languages. We believe our work provides novel hypotheses about cross-linguistic syntactic structures and multilingual processing, and more broadly shows how the study of language models can help inform linguistic theory.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.28924 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.28924v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28924 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words
Related coverage
A Study of Crosslinguistic Influence in Language Models
arXiv · Jul 29, 2026
Translation Circuit Discovery and Targeted Optimization for Low-Resource Multilingual Translation
arXiv · Oct 16, 2026
Separating Syntax from Language: A Mechanistic Account of Translation in Multilingual LLMs
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026
How Vision Transformers Represent Position: A Mechanistic Comparison of Absolute and Rotary Positional Encodings
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026