Causal-Counterfactual RAG: The Integration of Causal-Counterfactual Reasoning into RAG

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing (NLP), enabling diverse applications by integrating large-scale pre-trained knowledge. However, their static knowledge limits dynamic reasoning over external information, especially in knowledge-intensive domains. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this challenge by combining retrieval mechanisms with generative modeling to improve contextual understanding. Traditional RAG systems suffer from disrupted contextual integrity due to text chunking and over-reliance on semantic similarity for retrieval, often resulting in shallow and less accurate responses. We propose Causal-Counterfactual RAG, a novel framework that integrates explicit causal graphs representing cause-effect relationships into the retrieval process and incorporates counterfactual reasoning grounded on the causal structure. Unlike conventional methods, our framework evaluates not only direct causal evidence but also the counterfactuality of associated causes, combining results from both to generate more robust, accurate, and interpretable answers. By leveraging causal pathways and associated hypothetical scenarios, Causal-Counterfactual RAG preserves contextual coherence, reduces hallucination, and enhances reasoning fidelity.

We are withdrawing this manuscript because further review revealed several sections that require substantial revision. We have since re-evaluated the research, conducted additional analysis and experiments, and significantly updated the methodology and overall scope of the work. The current version therefore no longer accurately represents the revised research

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2509.14435 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2509.14435v3 [cs.CL] for this version)