aiqbench analysis
This study addresses the critical safety implications of adopting time series foundation models, highlighting how centralization creates concentration risks where diverse forecasting applications inherit identical biases and failure modes. By applying a causal analysis framework to Chronos-2 and TimesFM-2.5, the research identifies specific vulnerabilities in handling regime switches and energy-release patterns that stem from pretraining data limitations. These findings provide essential guidance for developers on model selection and deployment strategies to mitigate systemic risks in high-stakes forecasting environments.
Causal Analysis for Time Series Foundation Models
arXiv:2608.24303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transitioning from bespoke time series models towards time series foundation models changes the relationship of model and application from one-to-one to one-to-many. This shift introduces concentration risk as many, potentially high-risk, forecasting applications are exposed to the same biases and failure modes of a single time series foundation model. At the same time, this centralization allows for economies of scale in model development and validation. In this study we investigate how biases and failure modes of time series foundation models can be identified before deployment. We propose a causal analysis framework to investigate the ability of a time series foundation model to preserve time series patterns. To achieve this, we intervene on parameterized synthetic time series generators and measure the corresponding change in model output under ceteris paribus conditions. We apply our causal analysis framework to Chronos-2 and TimesFM-2.5 and test them across six distinct time series patterns. We find safe configurations for trend and harmonic oscillation patterns. The results also indicate a bias in both models towards overestimating persistence, sudden failures for both models against the regime switch pattern and failure for TimesFM-2.5 against the energy-release pattern. Our review of the original works for both models indicates that the findings might be explained by the data used for pretraining. We conclude our study with suggestions for further model development, recommendations for application-specific model selection, and a discussion of limitations and further research directions.
Abstract:Transitioning from bespoke time series models towards time series foundation models changes the relationship of model and application from one-to-one to one-to-many. This shift introduces concentration risk as many, potentially high-risk, forecasting applications are exposed to the same biases and failure modes of a single time series foundation model. At the same time, this centralization allows for economies of scale in model development and validation. In this study we investigate how biases and failure modes of time series foundation models can be identified before deployment. We propose a causal analysis framework to investigate the ability of a time series foundation model to preserve time series patterns. To achieve this, we intervene on parameterized synthetic time series generators and measure the corresponding change in model output under ceteris paribus conditions. We apply our causal analysis framework to Chronos-2 and TimesFM-2.5 and test them across six distinct time series patterns. We find safe configurations for trend and harmonic oscillation patterns. The results also indicate a bias in both models towards overestimating persistence, sudden failures for both models against the regime switch pattern and failure for TimesFM-2.5 against the energy-release pattern. Our review of the original works for both models indicates that the findings might be explained by the data used for pretraining. We conclude our study with suggestions for further model development, recommendations for application-specific model selection, and a discussion of limitations and further research directions.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.24303 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.24303v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.24303 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 328 words
Related coverage

Introducing Timestral
Mistral AI · Oct 15, 2026

Google AI Releases TimesFM-3: A 330M Parameter Zero-Shot Foundation Model For Multivariate Time Series Forecasting
MarkTechPost · Aug 31, 2026
DoTime: A Synthetic Benchmark Generator for Interventional and Counterfactual Time Series
arXiv · Jul 31, 2026
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · Jul 26, 2026